UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 000-50976
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 01-0666114 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
550 West Van Buren Street
Chicago, Illinois
60607
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(312) 583-8700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerx | Accelerated filer | ¨ | ||||
Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of October 30, 2013, 23,243,551 shares of the registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding.
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
INDEX
Page | ||||
Item 1. |
||||
1 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Other Comprehensive Income |
2 | |||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
20 | ||
Item 3. |
40 | |||
Item 4. |
40 | |||
Item 1. |
41 | |||
Item 1A. |
41 | |||
Item 2. |
42 | |||
Item 3. |
42 | |||
Item 4. |
42 | |||
Item 5. |
42 | |||
Item 6. |
43 | |||
44 |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 30,781 | $ | 25,162 | ||||
Receivables from clients, net |
82,007 | 97,510 | ||||||
Unbilled services, net |
82,381 | 47,232 | ||||||
Income tax receivable |
2,765 | 192 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
13,290 | 14,751 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
21,877 | 15,525 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
233,101 | 200,372 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
35,968 | 33,805 | ||||||
Other non-current assets |
16,614 | 15,322 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
14,815 | 18,879 | ||||||
Goodwill |
519,514 | 519,522 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 820,012 | $ | 787,900 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 8,620 | $ | 8,461 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
16,447 | 17,692 | ||||||
Accrued payroll and related benefits |
61,956 | 61,672 | ||||||
Bank borrowings, current portion |
25,000 | - | ||||||
Accrued consideration for business acquisitions, current portion |
5,103 | 5,640 | ||||||
Income tax payable |
221 | 7,872 | ||||||
Deferred revenues |
13,114 | 15,388 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
130,461 | 116,725 | ||||||
Non-current liabilities: |
||||||||
Deferred compensation and other liabilities |
4,892 | 6,973 | ||||||
Bank borrowings, net of current portion |
150,000 | 192,500 | ||||||
Deferred lease incentives |
10,163 | 6,936 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
20,613 | 14,560 | ||||||
Accrued consideration for business acquisitions, net of current portion |
- | 4,885 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total non-current liabilities |
185,668 | 225,854 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 25,224,317 and 24,793,327 shares issued at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively |
244 | 240 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,980,776 and 1,880,809 shares at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively |
(87,338) | (83,715) | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
438,135 | 420,825 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
153,643 | 109,330 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(801) | (1,359) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
503,883 | 445,321 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 820,012 | $ | 787,900 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
1
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Revenues and reimbursable expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 174,735 | $ | 161,888 | $ | 509,178 | $ | 445,196 | ||||||||
Reimbursable expenses |
17,542 | 13,470 | 51,001 | 41,820 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues and reimbursable expenses |
192,277 | 175,358 | 560,179 | 487,016 | ||||||||||||
Direct costs and reimbursable expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown in operating expenses): |
||||||||||||||||
Direct costs |
106,087 | 89,283 | 315,084 | 277,942 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets and software development costs |
675 | 787 | 2,007 | 3,071 | ||||||||||||
Reimbursable expenses |
17,531 | 13,405 | 51,000 | 41,808 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total direct costs and reimbursable expenses |
124,293 | 103,475 | 368,091 | 322,821 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating expenses and other operating gains: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
37,197 | 31,095 | 100,307 | 92,437 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
- | 2,194 | 596 | 3,253 | ||||||||||||
Restatement related expenses |
- | 68 | - | 1,785 | ||||||||||||
Litigation settlement (gain) loss |
(5,300) | - | (6,450) | 1,150 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,968 | 4,879 | 14,624 | 13,585 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
- | 13,083 | - | 13,083 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses and other operating gains |
36,865 | 51,319 | 109,077 | 125,293 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
31,119 | 20,564 | 83,011 | 38,902 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of interest income |
(1,531) | (2,312) | (5,100) | (6,193) | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
104 | 136 | (35) | 306 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other expense, net |
(1,427) | (2,176) | (5,135) | (5,887) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense |
29,692 | 18,388 | 77,876 | 33,015 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
12,531 | 7,972 | 33,532 | 15,707 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
17,161 | 10,416 | 44,344 | 17,308 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
10 | 47 | (31) | 518 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 17,171 | $ | 10,463 | $ | 44,313 | $ | 17,826 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net earnings per basic share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.77 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 0.79 | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
- | 0.01 | - | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.77 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 0.81 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net earnings per diluted share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.75 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 0.78 | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
- | - | - | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.75 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 0.80 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average shares used in calculating earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
22,386 | 21,950 | 22,293 | 21,881 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
22,873 | 22,326 | 22,712 | 22,247 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 17,171 | $ | 10,463 | $ | 44,313 | $ | 17,826 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation gain, net of tax |
1,025 | 496 | 119 | 358 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedging instruments, net of tax |
(245) | (144) | 439 | (336) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
780 | 352 | 558 | 22 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 17,951 | $ | 10,815 | $ | 44,871 | $ | 17,848 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
2
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Common Stock |
Treasury Stock | Additional Paid-In |
Retained | Accumulated Other Comprehensive |
Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 |
23,904,125 | $ | 240 | (1,889,465 | ) | $ | (83,715 | ) | $ | 420,825 | $ | 109,330 | $ | (1,359 | ) | $ | 445,321 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
44,313 | 558 | 44,871 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in connection with: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards, net of cancellations |
447,988 | 4 | (80,569 | ) | (2,863 | ) | 2,859 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
26,294 | - | 39 | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
13,280 | 13,280 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares redeemed for employee tax withholdings |
(20,426 | ) | (760 | ) | (760) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit on share-based compensation |
1,132 | 1,132 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2013 |
|
24,378,407 |
|
$ | 244 | (1,990,460 | ) | $ | (87,338 | ) | $ | 438,135 | $ | 153,643 | $ | (801) | $ | 503,883 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 44,313 | $ | 17,826 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
16,631 | 18,994 | ||||||
Share-based compensation |
12,692 | 11,183 | ||||||
Allowances for doubtful accounts and unbilled services |
3,153 | 1,723 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
7,062 | 2,458 | ||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
- | 13,083 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired: |
||||||||
(Increase) decrease in receivables from clients |
13,200 | 9,532 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in unbilled services |
(36,083) | (10,698) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in current income tax receivable / payable, net |
(10,218) | 19,502 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(1,304) | 2,738 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(2,018) | (4,783) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll and related benefits |
891 | (24,092) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues |
(3,028) | (14,616) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
45,291 | 42,850 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
(14,383) | (14,344) | ||||||
Net investment in life insurance policies |
(842) | (569) | ||||||
Purchases of businesses, net of cash acquired |
(297) | (53,832) | ||||||
Capitalization of internally developed software |
(1,207) | - | ||||||
Proceeds from note receivable |
438 | - | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(16,291) | (68,745) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
39 | 30 | ||||||
Shares redeemed for employee tax withholdings |
(760) | (3,874) | ||||||
Tax benefit from share-based compensation |
1,374 | 1,325 | ||||||
Proceeds from borrowings under credit facility |
83,500 | 244,000 | ||||||
Repayments on credit facility |
(101,000) | (215,000) | ||||||
Payments for debt issue costs |
(1,155) | (2,482) | ||||||
Payments of capital lease obligations |
- | (8) | ||||||
Deferred acquisition payment |
(5,356) | - | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(23,358) | 23,991 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(23) | 36 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
5,619 | (1,868) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
25,162 | 5,080 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
$ | 30,781 | $ | 3,212 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Non-cash financing activities: |
||||||||
Deferred payments related to business acquisitions |
- | $ | 10,272 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
1. | Description of Business |
Huron Consulting Group is a leading provider of operational and financial consulting services. We help clients in diverse industries improve performance, reduce costs, leverage technology, process and review large amounts of complex data, address regulatory changes, recover from distress and stimulate growth. Our professionals employ their expertise in administration, management, finance, operations, strategy and technology to provide our clients with specialized analyses and customized advice and solutions that are tailored to address each clients particular challenges and opportunities to deliver sustainable and measurable results. We provide consulting services to a wide variety of both financially sound and distressed organizations, including healthcare organizations, leading academic institutions, Fortune 500 companies, governmental entities and law firms.
2. | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature necessary for the fair statement of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented in conformity with GAAP. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013.
Certain amounts reported in the previous year have been reclassified to conform to the 2013 presentation. Our results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year or any other interim period.
In the second quarter of 2013, we identified a $1.1 million error in stock-based compensation expense resulting from the use of the straight-line attribution method for performance awards with graded vesting features granted in prior periods. The $1.1 million pretax adjustment, which resulted in a $0.9 million increase in Direct costs and a $0.2 million increase in Selling, general and administrative expense, with a corresponding $1.1 million increase in Additional paid-in capital, represents the cumulative error related to all prior period financial statements beginning with the first quarter of 2010 through the first quarter of 2013. After consideration of both quantitative and qualitative factors, we concluded that our previously issued annual and quarterly financial statements for the years 2010, 2011, 2012 and the first quarter of 2013 were not materially misstated, and the effect of recognizing this adjustment during the second quarter of 2013 was not material for the period then ended and is not expected to be material for full year 2013 results.
3. | New Accounting Pronouncements |
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This guidance requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, be presented in the financial statements as either a reduction to a deferred tax asset or separately as a liability depending on the existence, availability and/or use of an operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2014. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2013-11 to impact our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Parents Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment Upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets Within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity, which amends current accounting guidance on foreign currency matters. This guidance requires that the entire amount of a cumulative translation adjustment related to an entitys investment in a foreign entity should be released when there has been a: (i) sale of a subsidiary or group of net assets within a foreign entity and the sale represents the substantially complete liquidation of the investment in the foreign entity, (ii) loss of a controlling financial interest in an investment in a foreign entity, and (iii) step acquisition for a foreign entity. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2014. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2013-05 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
5
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which amends current accounting guidance on comprehensive income. The guidance requires an entity to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income if the amount is reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, a cross reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail about the reclassification amounts is required. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2013. The guidance required a change in disclosure only and did not have any effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
4. | Discontinued Operations |
In recent years, we have undertaken several separate initiatives to divest certain practices within the Huron Financial segment in order to enable us to devote more of our energy and financial resources to the remaining businesses of the Company where we have a more substantial market presence. Most recently, on December 30, 2011, we sold the Accounting Advisory (AA) practice to a group of investors including the managing director of the practice at the time and recognized a loss of $1.9 million in connection with the sale.
The operating results of AA are reported as discontinued operations. All other operations of the business are considered continuing operations. Summarized operating results of discontinued operations are presented in the following table:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 24 | $ | | $ | 57 | $ | 683 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income tax expense |
$ | 18 | $ | 78 | $ | (51) | $ | 836 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
$ | 10 | $ | 47 | $ | (31) | $ | 518 |
There were no significant assets or liabilities related to discontinued operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.
6
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
5. | Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
The table below sets forth the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Current Segments | ||||||||||||||||||||
Former Segments |
Huron Healthcare |
Huron Legal |
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
Huron Financial |
Total | |||||||||||||||
Health and Education Consulting |
$ 355,880 | $ | | $ | 94,601 | $ | $ | 450,481 | ||||||||||||
Legal Consulting |
| 52,947 | | | 52,947 | |||||||||||||||
Financial Consulting |
| | | 159,077 | 159,077 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total new alignment as of December 31, 2012 |
355,880 | 52,947 | 94,601 | 159,077 | 662,505 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated impairment |
| | | (142,983) | (142,983) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Goodwill, net as of December 31, 2012 |
355,880 | 52,947 | 94,601 | 16,094 | 519,522 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
| (8) | | | (8) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Goodwill, net as of September 30, 2013 |
$ 355,880 | $ | 52,939 | $ | 94,601 | $ 16,094 | $ | 519,514 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2013 Goodwill Reassignment
During the first quarter of 2013, we changed our internal financial reporting structure. Under the new structure, our former Health and Education Consulting segment became two separate segments: Huron Healthcare and Huron Education and Life Sciences. In addition, certain immaterial practices which were historically part of our Health and Education Consulting segment were combined and disclosed in our All Other segment. The Legal Consulting segment is now referred to as Huron Legal and the Financial Consulting segment is now referred to as Huron Financial. The structure of the Legal Consulting and Financial Consulting segments did not change. As a result of these changes, we now have five reporting segments, which are the same as our operating segments and reporting units.
In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other, we reassigned the goodwill balance of the Health and Education Consulting segment using the relative fair value approach based on an evaluation of expected future discounted cash flows. Based on this relative fair value analysis, we reassigned $355.9 million of goodwill to Huron Healthcare and $94.6 million of goodwill to Huron Education and Life Sciences.
In conjunction with the goodwill reassignment, we performed the first step of the goodwill impairment test for the goodwill balances within our Huron Healthcare and Huron Education and Life Sciences reporting units as of January 2, 2013. Based on the result of the first step of the goodwill impairment test, we determined that the fair values of our Huron Healthcare and Huron Education and Life Sciences reporting units exceeded their carrying values. Since the fair values of both reporting units exceeded their carrying values, the second step of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary.
Third Quarter 2012 Goodwill Impairment Charge
In the second quarter of 2012, our Huron Financial segment leadership undertook several initiatives intended to improve the reporting units financial performance. While the reporting units third quarter financial results improved over the second quarter results, the progress of the financial, operational, and business development improvements was not in line with our expectations, causing us to believe that the likely time frame to improve the reporting units performance would be longer than originally anticipated. Therefore, we concluded that the carrying value of the reporting unit likely exceeded its fair value and, in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we performed an interim impairment test.
Our goodwill impairment test was performed using a quantitative two-step process. In the first step, we compared the fair value of the Huron Financial segment with its net book value (or carrying amount), including goodwill. In estimating the fair value of the Huron Financial segment, we relied on a combination of the income approach and the market approach, utilizing the guideline company method, with a fifty-fifty weighting. Based on the result of the first step, we determined that the fair value of our Huron Financial segment was less than its carrying value as of September 30, 2012 and, as such, we applied the second step of the goodwill impairment test to this reporting unit. The second step compared the implied fair value of the Huron Financial segments goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That is, the
7
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit. Based on the result of the second step of the goodwill impairment analysis, we recorded a $13.1 million non-cash pretax charge to reduce the carrying value of goodwill in our Huron Financial segment.
In estimating future cash flows for our Huron Financial segment, we relied on an internally generated six-year forecast and a three percent long-term assumed annual revenue growth rate for periods after the six-year forecast. Our forecast was based on our historical experience, current backlog, expected market demand, and other industry information. Our discounted cash flow analysis assumed a 13% weighted average cost of capital (WACC) discount rate.
Intangible assets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consisted of the following:
September 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
Useful Life in Years |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
1 to 13 | $ | 25,006 | $ | 13,160 | $ | 24,738 | $ | 10,268 | |||||||||||
Non-competition agreements |
1 to 6 | 4,611 | 3,658 | 4,684 | 3,067 | |||||||||||||||
Trade names |
1 to 8 | 150 | 43 | 150 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
Technology and software |
5 | 4,041 | 2,357 | 4,041 | 1,751 | |||||||||||||||
Document reviewer database |
3 | 450 | 225 | 450 | 90 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 34,258 | $ | 19,443 | $ | 34,063 | $ | 15,184 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. The majority of customer relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis to correspond to the cash flows expected to be derived from the relationships. All other customer relationships, non-competition agreements, trade names, technology and software, and the document reviewer database are amortized on a straight-line basis.
Intangible assets amortization expense was $1.4 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. Intangible assets amortization expense was $4.3 million and $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. Estimated annual intangible assets amortization expense is $5.8 million for 2013, $4.6 million for 2014, $3.1 million for 2015, $1.9 million for 2016, $1.2 million for 2017 and $0.8 million for 2018. Actual future amortization expense could differ from these estimated amounts as a result of future acquisitions and other factors.
8
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
6. | Earnings Per Share |
Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding unvested restricted common stock. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential reduction in earnings per share that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock under the treasury stock method. Earnings per share under the basic and diluted computations are as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 |
2012 |
|||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 17,161 | $ | 10,416 | $ | 44,344 | $ | 17,308 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
10 | 47 | (31) | 518 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 17,171 | $ | 10,463 | $ | 44,313 | $ | 17,826 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
22,386 | 21,950 | 22,293 | 21,881 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted average common stock equivalents |
487 | 376 | 419 | 366 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
22,873 | 22,326 | 22,712 | 22,247 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net earnings per basic share: |
||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.77 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 0.79 | ||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 0.01 | | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.77 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 0.81 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net earnings per diluted share: |
||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.75 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 0.78 | ||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.75 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 0.80 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes unvested restricted common stock, outstanding options and other common stock equivalents in periods where inclusion of such potential common stock instruments would be anti-dilutive. The weighted average common stock equivalents presented above do not include the effect of approximately 36,600 and 42,200 common stock equivalents for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and approximately 78,900 and 85,300 common stock equivalents for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
7. | Borrowings |
During 2011, the Company and certain of the Companys subsidiaries as guarantors entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with various financial institutions, as amended by the first and second amendments to the credit agreement dated as of August 31, 2012 and September 25, 2013, respectively (as amended and modified, the 2011 Credit Agreement). The 2011 Credit Agreement replaced the previous Credit Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2006, and all subsequent amendments thereto, by and among the Company and the lenders therein. The second amendment to the credit agreement, which we entered into during the third quarter of 2013, extended the term of the 2011 Credit Agreement from August 31, 2017 to September 25, 2018, and provided for less restrictive covenants, among other things.
The 2011 Credit Agreement consists of a senior secured credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $450.0 million comprised of a five-year revolving credit facility (Revolver) under which the Company may borrow from time to time up to $247.5 million and a $202.5 million five-year term loan facility (Term Loan) that was funded in a single advance on the closing date of the first amendment. The 2011 Credit Agreement provides for the option to increase the revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to $50 million subject to certain requirements as defined in the 2011 Credit Agreement. The proceeds of the senior secured credit facility were used to refinance existing indebtedness and will continue to be used for working capital, capital expenditures, and other corporate purposes.
9
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
The obligations under the 2011 Credit Agreement are secured pursuant to a Security Agreement with Bank of America as Collateral Agent. The Security Agreement grants Bank of America, N.A., for the ratable benefit of the lenders under the 2011 Credit Agreement, a first-priority lien, subject to permitted liens, on substantially all of the personal property assets of the Company and the subsidiary guarantors. The Revolver and Term Loan are also secured by a pledge of 100% of the voting stock or other equity interests in our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the voting stock or other equity interests in our foreign subsidiaries.
Fees and interest on borrowings vary based on our total debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) ratio as set forth in the 2011 Credit Agreement. Interest is based on a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or a spread over the base rate, as selected by the Company. The base rate is the greater of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, (b) the Prime Rate and (c) except during a Eurodollar Unavailability Period, the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.0%.
As of the date of the second amendment to the credit agreement, the Term Loan had a principal amount outstanding of $181.3 million. This principal balance is subject to scheduled quarterly amortization payments equal to 6.9% of the principal balance in 2013, 13.8% in 2014, 15.8% in 2015, 16.6% in 2016, 16.6% in 2017, and 30.3% in 2018, as set forth in the 2011 Credit Agreement. The maturity date for the Term Loan is September 25, 2018, at which time the outstanding principal balance and all accrued interest will be due and payable in full. All outstanding borrowings under the Revolver, as amended, will be due upon expiration of the 2011 Credit Agreement on September 25, 2018. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has made all scheduled quarterly amortization payments as they have come due in accordance with the Term Loan.
Under the 2011 Credit Agreement, dividends are restricted to an amount up to $50 million plus 50% of cumulative consolidated net income from the closing date of the 2011 Credit Agreement plus 50% of the net cash proceeds from equity issuances. In addition, certain acquisitions and similar transactions need to be approved by the lenders.
The 2011 Credit Agreement contains quarterly financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 2.25 to 1.00 and a maximum leverage ratio that varies throughout the term and was 3.00 to 1.00 as of September 30, 2013, as those ratios are defined therein, as well as a minimum net worth greater than $150 million. At September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with these financial covenants with a fixed charge coverage ratio of 4.14 to 1.00, a leverage ratio of 1.18 to 1.00, and net worth greater than $150 million. At December 31, 2012, we were also in compliance with these financial debt covenants.
The borrowing capacity under the 2011 Credit Agreement is reduced by any outstanding letters of credit and payments under the Term Loan. At September 30, 2013, outstanding letters of credit totaled $4.8 million and are primarily used as security deposits for our office facilities. As of September 30, 2013, the unused borrowing capacity under the 2011 Credit Agreement was $242.7 million. Borrowings outstanding under this credit facility at September 30, 2013 totaled $175.0 million, all of which was under the Term Loan. These borrowings carried a weighted average interest rate of 2.0%, including the effect of the interest rate swaps described below in Note 9 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity. Borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2012 were $192.5 million and carried a weighted average interest rate of 2.5%. Effective March 31, 2013, we have classified as current liabilities the scheduled quarterly principal payments due under the Term Loan within twelve months of the balance sheet date, as we intend to make these payments with cash from operations rather than from availability under the Revolver.
8. | Restructuring Charges |
During the second quarter of 2013, we incurred a $0.6 million pretax restructuring charge related to the consolidation of office space in Washington, D.C. The charge primarily consisted of the accrual of remaining lease payments for an office we vacated during the second quarter of 2013.
During the third quarter of 2012, we incurred a $2.2 million pretax restructuring charge primarily consisting of $0.9 million related to the consolidation of office space in Washington, D.C. and $1.1 million related to our office relocation in New York, which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2012. The Washington, D.C. charge included an accrual of $0.7 million for the remaining lease payments, net of estimated sublease income, for the office space we vacated during the third quarter of 2012 and $0.2 million of accelerated depreciation on leasehold improvements for that space. The New York charge included $0.4 million of accelerated depreciation and $0.7 million for brokerage fees related to the execution of a sublease
10
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
arrangement. We did not incur a lease charge related to the relocation of our New York City office space as income from our subtenant is expected to more than offset our remaining lease obligations through 2016, net of our deferred lease liability. During the first and second quarters of 2012, we incurred cumulative charges of $1.1 million primarily related to accelerated depreciation on our New York office leasehold improvements, partially offset by the net favorable impact of updated assumptions for lease accruals related to previously vacated office spaces.
As of September 30, 2013, our restructuring charge liability is $0.8 million, and primarily consists of the present value of remaining lease payments, net of estimated sublease income, for our vacated office spaces in San Francisco and Washington, D.C. The restructuring charge liability is included as a component of Accrued expenses and Deferred compensation and other liabilities.
9. | Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity |
On March 20, 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of $100.0 million effective on March 31, 2009 and ending on February 23, 2012. We entered into this derivative instrument to hedge against the risk of changes in future cash flows related to changes in interest rates on $100.0 million of the total variable-rate borrowings outstanding described above in Note 7 Borrowings. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we received from the counterparty interest on the $100.0 million notional amount based on one-month LIBOR and we paid to the counterparty a fixed rate of 1.715%. This swap effectively converted $100.0 million of our variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings beginning on March 31, 2009 and through February 23, 2012.
On December 8, 2011, we entered into a forward amortizing interest rate swap agreement effective on February 29, 2012 and ending on April 14, 2016. We entered into this derivative instrument to continue hedging against the interest rate risks of our variable-rate borrowings described above. The swap had an initial notional amount of $56.6 million and amortizes throughout the term. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we receive from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on one-month LIBOR and we pay to the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.9875%.
On May 30, 2012, we entered into an additional forward amortizing interest rate swap agreement effective on May 31, 2012 and ending on April 14, 2016. We entered into this derivative instrument to further hedge against the interest rate risks of our variable-rate borrowings described above. The swap had an initial notional amount of $37.0 million and amortizes throughout the term. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we receive from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on one-month LIBOR and we pay to the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.70%.
On April 4, 2013, we entered into a one-year forward amortizing interest rate swap agreement effective on March 31, 2014 and ending on August 31, 2017. We entered into this derivative instrument to further hedge against the interest rate risks of our variable-rate borrowings described above. The swap has an initial notional amount of $60.0 million and amortizes such that, collectively with our other two interest rate swaps, we are effectively fixing the interest rate on 80% of our Term Loan borrowings throughout the term of the swap agreement. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we will receive from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on one-month LIBOR and we will pay to the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.985%.
FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the balance sheet. In accordance with ASC Topic 815, we have designated these derivative instruments as cash flow hedges. As such, changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (OCI) to the extent of effectiveness and reclassified into interest expense upon settlement. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative instruments is recognized in interest expense. As of September 30, 2013, it was anticipated that $0.4 million of the net losses, net of tax, currently recorded in OCI will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months. Our interest rate swap agreements were effective during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
11
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
The table below sets forth additional information relating to these interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Fair Value (Derivative Asset and Liability) | ||||||||
Balance Sheet Location |
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
||||||
Other non-current assets |
$ | 582 | $ | | ||||
Accrued expenses |
$ | 661 | $ | 493 | ||||
Deferred compensation and other liabilities |
$ | 124 | $ | 439 |
All of the Companys derivative instruments are transacted under the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master agreements. These agreements permit the net settlement of amounts owed in the event of default and certain other termination events. Although netting is permitted, it is the Companys policy to record all derivative assets and liabilities on a gross basis on the consolidated balance sheets. If we had elected to net derivative instruments subject to master netting agreements as of September 30, 2013, the impact would have reduced our derivative assets and liabilities by $0.2 million. As of December 31, 2012, all of our derivative instruments were recorded as liabilities.
We do not use derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, and we did not have any other derivative instruments or hedging activities as of September 30, 2013. Refer to Note 11 Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for additional information on our derivative instruments.
10. | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Certain of our assets and liabilities are measured at fair value. FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value and requires companies to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy consists of three levels based on the objectivity of the inputs as follows:
Level 1 Inputs | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. | |
Level 2 Inputs | Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. | |
Level 3 Inputs | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. |
Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value. The carrying values for receivables from clients, unbilled services, accounts payable, deferred revenues and other accrued liabilities reasonably approximate fair market value due to the nature of the financial instrument and the short-term maturity of these items. The carrying values of our bank borrowings reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate fair value, using level 2 inputs, since they bear interest at variable rates based on market rates as set forth in the 2011 Credit Agreement. Refer to Note 7 Borrowings.
12
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
The table below sets forth our fair value hierarchy for our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Total | |||||||||||||
September 30, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Promissory note |
$ | | $ | | $ | 2,666 | $ | 2,666 | ||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
| 366 | | 366 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
$ | | $ | 366 | $ | 2,666 | $ | 3,032 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | | $ | 569 | $ | | $ | 569 | ||||||||
Deferred acquisition payments |
| | 5,103 | 5,103 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | | $ | 569 | $ | 5,103 | $ | 5,672 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Asset: |
||||||||||||||||
Promissory note |
$ | | $ | | $ | 2,907 | $ | 2,907 | ||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | | $ | 932 | $ | | $ | 932 | ||||||||
Deferred acquisition payments |
| | 10,525 | 10,525 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | | $ | 932 | $ | 10,525 | $ | 11,457 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of the consideration received for the sale of our AA practice on December 30, 2011, the Company received a $3.5 million promissory note payable over four years. The note will be paid to the Company in quarterly installments of approximately $0.2 million which began in the second quarter of 2013 with a final payment of approximately $1.1 million on the maturity date in December 2015. The fair value of the note is based on the net present value of the projected cash flows using a discount rate of 14%, which accounts for the risks associated with the note. The decrease in the fair value of the note during the first nine months of 2013 reflects the principal payments received, less the accretion of interest income in excess of interest payments received.
The fair value of the interest rate swaps was derived using estimates to settle the interest rate swap agreements, which are based on the net present value of expected future cash flows on each leg of the swaps utilizing market-based inputs and discount rates reflecting the risks involved.
Deferred acquisition payments are included in the total purchase consideration for certain business acquisitions the Company has completed and represent fixed future payments owed to the sellers of those businesses. The fair value of the deferred acquisition payments is based on the payment terms, which range from one to two years, and the net present value of expected cash flows using a discount rate ranging from 4% to 8%. The decrease in the fair value of the deferred acquisition payments during the first nine months of 2013 reflects payments of principal and accrued interest during the first nine months of 2013, less the accretion of interest expense in excess of interest payments made.
13
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
11. | Other Comprehensive Income |
The table below sets forth the components of other comprehensive income, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Before Taxes |
Tax (Expense) Benefit |
Net of Taxes |
Before Taxes |
Tax (Expense) Benefit |
Net of Taxes |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
$ | 1,019 | $ | 6 | $ | 1,025 | $ | 496 | $ | | $ | 496 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value |
$ | (549) | $ | 218 | $ | (331) | $ | (382) | $ | 151 | $ | (231) | ||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments into earnings |
142 | (56) | 86 | 144 | (57) | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) |
$ | (407) | $ | 162 | $ | (245) | $ | (238) | $ | 94 | $ | (144) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
$ | 612 | $ | 168 | $ | 780 | $ | 258 | $ | 94 | $ | 352 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Before Taxes |
Tax (Expense) Benefit |
Net of Taxes |
Before Taxes |
Tax (Expense) Benefit |
Net of Taxes |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
$ | 62 | $ | 57 | $ | 119 | $ | 403 | $ | (45) | $ | 358 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value |
$ | 308 | $ | (122) | $ | 186 | $ | (1,074) | $ | 428 | $ | (646) | ||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments into earnings |
421 | (168) | 253 | 516 | (206) | 310 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) |
$ | 729 | $ | (290) | $ | 439 | $ | (558) | $ | 222 | $ | (336) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
$ | 791 | $ | (233) | $ | 558 | $ | (155) | $ | 177 | $ | 22 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The before tax amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss related to our cash flow hedges are recorded to Interest expense, net of interest income.
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, includes the following components:
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments |
Net Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2012 |
$ | (805) | $ | (554) | $ | (1,359) | ||||||
Current period change |
119 | 439 | 558 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance, September 30, 2013 |
$ | (686) | $ | (115) | $ | (801) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
12. | Income Taxes |
The Companys effective tax rates for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were 42.2% and 43.4%, respectively. The Companys effective tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were 43.1% and 47.6%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were higher than the statutory rate, inclusive of state income taxes, due primarily to the impact of foreign losses with no tax benefit and certain non-deductible business expenses, partially offset by the impact of certain credits and deductions. The effective tax rates for both periods in 2012 were higher than the statutory rate, inclusive of state income taxes, due primarily to the impact of foreign losses with no tax benefit, partially offset by the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions. The foreign losses with no tax benefit had a larger impact on our effective tax rate in both periods of 2012 compared to 2013 due to the lower pretax income from continuing operations for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.
13. | Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees |
Litigation
Qui Tam Action
On December 9, 2009, plaintiff, Associates Against Outlier Fraud, filed a first amended qui tam complaint against Huron Consulting Group Inc. and others under the federal and New York state False Claims Act (FCA) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The federal and state FCA authorize private individuals (known as relators) to sue on behalf of the government (known as qui tam actions) alleging that false or fraudulent claims were knowingly submitted to the government. Once a qui tam action is filed, the government may elect to intervene in the action. If the government declines to intervene, the relator may proceed with the action. Under the federal and state FCA, the government may recover treble damages and civil penalties (civil penalties of up to $11,000 per violation under the federal FCA and $12,000 per violation under the state FCA). On January 6, 2010, the United States declined to intervene in the lawsuit. After the Court granted Hurons motion to dismiss without prejudice, on September 29, 2010, the relator filed a second amended complaint alleging that Huron and others caused St. Vincent Catholic Medical Center to receive more than $30 million in inflated outlier payments under the Medicare and Medicaid programs in violation of the federal and state FCA and seeking to recover an unspecified amount of civil penalties. On March 8, 2013, the Court granted Hurons motion for summary judgment and dismissed the relators second amended complaint in its entirety with prejudice. As a result, we reversed the charge of $1.2 million relating to settlement discussions which we recorded in the second quarter of 2012, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. The relator filed an appeal on April 2, 2013. On April 8, 2013, Huron filed an appeal of an earlier denial of a motion to dismiss filed by Huron which argued that the relators action was barred because, under the FCA jurisdictional bar, the action was based on publicly disclosed information and the relator cannot qualify as an original source. We continue to believe that the claims are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in this matter.
Tamalluk Business Development LLC v. Huron Consulting Services LLC (Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance)
On August 22, 2013, we learned that Tamalluk Business Development LLC, who was Hurons agent in Abu Dhabi, and its principal, Mubarak Ahmad Bin Hamouda Al Dhaheri, filed a claim against Huron Consulting Services LLC in the Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance. The lawsuit alleges that under the agency agreement, Tamalluk was entitled to a commission on certain amounts that Huron collected from Abu Dhabi clients, and that Huron breached the agreement with Tamalluk and caused damages by declining to enter into a client engagement in Abu Dhabi and subsequently terminating the agency agreement with Tamalluk. Claimants allege they are entitled to $50 million for damage to reputation and defamation and another $50 million for breach of contract. Huron submitted its written response on September 25, 2013. The response states that Huron had the right to terminate the agency agreement with Tamalluk, and Huron had the sole discretion whether to accept or reject an engagement. Huron also filed a counterclaim on October 10, 2013 seeking a judicial order to permit the cancellation of Hurons commercial license to allow Huron to cease doing business in Abu Dhabi. We believe the claims made by Tamalluk Business Development and its principal are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in this matter.
15
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Other Litigation Gain
During the third quarter of 2013, we reached a settlement agreement to resolve a lawsuit brought by Huron, resulting in a gain of $5.3 million being recorded. We collected $2.6 million of the settlement amount during the fourth quarter of 2013, and we anticipate the remaining amount will be collected during the first quarter of 2014. The settlement receivable is recorded in Prepaid expenses and other current assets.
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are not a party to or threatened with any other litigation or legal proceeding that, in the current opinion of management, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. However, due to the risks and uncertainties inherent in legal proceedings, actual results could differ from current expected results.
Guarantees and Indemnification
Guarantees in the form of letters of credit totaling $4.8 million and $5.1 million were outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, to support certain office lease obligations as well as Middle East performance and bid bonds.
To the extent permitted by law, our bylaws and articles of incorporation require that we indemnify our officers and directors against judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement, including attorneys fees, incurred in connection with civil or criminal action or proceedings, as it relates to their services to us if such person acted in good faith. Although there is no limit on the amount of indemnification, we may have recourse against our insurance carrier for certain payments made.
14. | Segment Information |
Segments are defined by FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, as components of a company in which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. In the first quarter of 2013, the Company reorganized its internal financial reporting structure. Under the new structure, the Company began reporting information as five operating segments: Huron Healthcare; Huron Legal; Huron Education and Life Sciences; Huron Financial; and All Other. Our chief operating decision maker manages the business under these five operating segments.
Under this new internal financial reporting structure, the former Health and Education Consulting segment became two separate segments: Huron Healthcare and Huron Education and Life Sciences. These practices continue to share a significant number of academic medical center clients and will continue to closely collaborate in the market. The Legal Consulting segment is now referred to as Huron Legal and the Financial Consulting segment is now referred to as Huron Financial. The structure of the Legal Consulting and Financial Consulting segments did not change. In addition, certain immaterial practices which were historically part of our Health and Education Consulting segment were combined and disclosed in our All Other segment. While our consolidated results have not been impacted, we have restated our historical segment information for consistent presentation.
| Huron Healthcare |
Our Huron Healthcare segment provides consulting services to national and regional integrated health systems, physician practices, community hospitals, managed care organizations, and academic medical centers. This segment provides consulting services related to hospital or healthcare organization performance improvement, revenue cycle improvement, clinical quality and care variation, labor productivity, non-labor cost management, information technology, patient flow improvement and physician practice management.
| Huron Legal |
Our Huron Legal segment provides advisory and business services to assist law departments of major global corporations and law firms with their strategy, organizational design and development, operational efficiency, and cost effectiveness. These results-driven services help reduce the amounts they spend on legal services and enhance client service. Our expertise focuses on strategic and management consulting, cost management, and technology and information management including matter management, records management, digital evidence, document review and discovery services.
16
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
| Huron Education and Life Sciences |
Our Huron Education and Life Sciences segment provides consulting services to universities, research institutions, healthcare organizations, academic medical centers, and pharmaceutical, medical device manufacturer and biotechnology companies. We develop and implement performance improvement, technology, and research enterprise solutions to help clients address challenges relating to financial management, strategy, operational and organizational effectiveness, research administration, and regulatory compliance.
| Huron Financial |
Our Huron Financial segment provides financial advisory, restructuring and turnaround, interim management, valuation, forensic and litigation, and operational improvement consulting services to companies in transition, boards of directors, and investors and lenders. Our consultants provide senior level involvement and extensive industry experience to drive results. Our experienced leadership, management depth and flexible staffing model allow us to efficiently lead projects ranging from middle market to large company assignments. We draw on career experience gathered from operations, lending, investment banking, portfolio and asset management, public accounting, and management consulting to provide practical business solutions.
| All Other |
Our All Other segment consists of any lines of business not managed by our other four operating segments. These businesses include our public sector consulting practice and our foreign healthcare and strategic consulting operations based in the Middle East.
Segment operating income consists of the revenues generated by a segment, less the direct costs of revenue and selling, general and administrative costs that are incurred directly by the segment. Unallocated corporate costs include costs related to administrative functions that are performed in a centralized manner that are not attributable to a particular segment. These administrative function costs include costs for corporate office support, certain office facility costs, costs relating to accounting and finance, human resources, legal, marketing, information technology and Company-wide business development functions, as well as costs related to overall corporate management.
The table below sets forth information about our operating segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, along with the items necessary to reconcile the segment information to the totals reported in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
17
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Huron Healthcare: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 86,957 | $ | 74,999 | $ | 244,648 | $ | 201,171 | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 30,772 | $ | 33,868 | $ | 91,440 | $ | 69,778 | ||||||||
Segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenues |
35.4% | 45.2% | 37.4% | 34.7% | ||||||||||||
Huron Legal: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 45,263 | $ | 46,153 | $ | 131,296 | $ | 133,443 | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 15,138 | $ | 11,479 | $ | 28,869 | $ | 33,489 | ||||||||
Segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenues |
33.4% | 24.9% | 22.0% | 25.1% | ||||||||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 34,806 | $ | 33,863 | $ | 107,666 | $ | 93,373 | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 7,773 | $ | 12,406 | $ | 28,672 | $ | 28,051 | ||||||||
Segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenues |
22.3% | 36.6% | 26.6% | 30.0% | ||||||||||||
Huron Financial: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 7,223 | $ | 6,689 | $ | 25,068 | $ | 16,821 | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 664 | $ | 1,763 | $ | 7,995 | $ | 1,659 | ||||||||
Segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenues |
9.2% | 26.4% | 31.9% | 9.9% | ||||||||||||
All Other: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 486 | $ | 184 | $ | 500 | $ | 388 | ||||||||
Operating loss |
$ | (285) | $ | (428) | $ | (701) | $ | (1,971) | ||||||||
Segment operating loss as a percentage of segment revenues |
N/M | N/M | N/M | N/M | ||||||||||||
Total Company: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 174,735 | $ | 161,888 | $ | 509,178 | $ | 445,196 | ||||||||
Reimbursable expenses |
17,542 | 13,470 | 51,001 | 41,820 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues and reimbursable expenses |
$ | 192,277 | $ | 175,358 | $ | 560,179 | $ | 487,016 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Statements of Earnings reconciliation: |
||||||||||||||||
Segment operating income |
$ | 54,062 | $ | 59,088 | $ | 156,275 | $ | 131,006 | ||||||||
Items not allocated at the segment level: |
||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses and gains |
17,975 | 20,562 | 58,640 | 65,436 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
4,968 | 4,879 | 14,624 | 13,585 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
| 13,083 | | 13,083 | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net |
1,427 | 2,176 | 5,135 | 5,887 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense |
$ | 29,692 | $ | 18,388 | $ | 77,876 | $ | 33,015 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M Not Meaningful
Segment Assets: | September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
||||||
Huron Healthcare |
$ | 79,678 | $ | 60,288 | ||||
Huron Legal |
47,846 | 51,594 | ||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
26,391 | 31,129 | ||||||
Huron Financial |
10,445 | 1,462 | ||||||
All Other |
72 | 50 | ||||||
Unallocated assets (1) |
655,580 | 643,377 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 820,012 | $ | 787,900 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Goodwill and intangible assets are included in unallocated assets, as management does not evaluate these items at the segment level when assessing segment performance or allocating resources. |
18
HURON CONSULTING GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
At both September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, no single client accounted for greater than 10% of our combined receivables and unbilled services balances. No single client generated greater than 10% of our consolidated revenues during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
15. | Subsequent Events |
On October 1, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of the assets of Blue Stone International, LLC (Blue Stone), a provider of professional services supporting Oracle enterprise performance management, information management, and business intelligence solutions. Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Blue Stone in exchange for $30 million in cash. The results of operations of Blue Stone will be included within the Huron Education and Life Sciences segment.
19
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Huron, Company, we, us and our refer to Huron Consulting Group Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical in nature, including those concerning the Companys current expectations about its future requirements and needs, are forward-looking statements as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as may, should, expects, provides, anticipates, assumes, can, will, meets, could, likely, intends, might, predicts, seeks, would, believes, estimates, plans or continues. These forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations about our future requirements and needs, results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements, including, without limitation, current expectations with respect to, among other factors, utilization rates, billing rates, and the number of revenue-generating professionals; that we are able to expand our service offerings; that we successfully integrate the businesses we acquire; and that existing market conditions continue to trend upward. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, among others, those described under Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 that may cause actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any anticipated results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events, or for any other reason.
OVERVIEW
Our Business
Huron Consulting Group is a leading provider of operational and financial consulting services. We help clients in diverse industries improve performance, reduce costs, leverage technology, process and review large amounts of complex data, address regulatory changes, recover from distress and stimulate growth. Our professionals employ their expertise in administration, management, finance, operations, strategy and technology to provide our clients with specialized analyses and customized advice and solutions that are tailored to address each clients particular challenges and opportunities to deliver sustainable and measurable results. We provide consulting services to a wide variety of both financially sound and distressed organizations, including healthcare organizations, leading academic institutions, Fortune 500 companies, governmental entities and law firms. We have worked with more than 90 of the top 100 research universities, more than 400 corporate general counsel, and more than 385 hospitals and academic medical centers.
We provide our services through five operating segments: Huron Healthcare, Huron Legal, Huron Education and Life Sciences, Huron Financial and All Other.
| Huron Healthcare |
Our Huron Healthcare segment provides consulting services to national and regional integrated health systems, physician practices, community hospitals, managed care organizations, and academic medical centers. This segment provides consulting services related to hospital or healthcare organization performance improvement, revenue cycle improvement, clinical quality and care variation, labor productivity, non-labor cost management, information technology, patient flow improvement and physician practice management.
| Huron Legal |
Our Huron Legal segment provides advisory and business services to assist law departments of major global corporations and law firms with their strategy, organizational design and development, operational efficiency, and cost effectiveness. These results-driven services help reduce the amounts they spend on legal services and enhance client service. Our expertise focuses on strategic and management consulting, cost management, and technology and information management including matter management, records management, digital evidence, document review and discovery services.
| Huron Education and Life Sciences |
Our Huron Education and Life Sciences segment provides consulting services to universities, research institutions, healthcare organizations, academic medical centers, and pharmaceutical, medical device manufacturer and biotechnology companies. We develop and implement performance improvement, technology, and research enterprise solutions to help clients address challenges relating to financial management, strategy, operational and organizational effectiveness, research administration, and regulatory compliance.
20
| Huron Financial |
Our Huron Financial segment provides financial advisory, restructuring and turnaround, interim management, valuation, forensic and litigation, and operational improvement consulting services to companies in transition, boards of directors, and investors and lenders. Our consultants provide senior level involvement and extensive industry experience to drive results. Our experienced leadership, management depth and flexible staffing model allow us to efficiently lead projects ranging from middle market to large company assignments. We draw on career experience gathered from operations, lending, investment banking, portfolio and asset management, public accounting, and management consulting to provide practical business solutions.
| All Other |
Our All Other segment consists of any line of business not managed by our other four operating segments. These businesses include our public sector consulting practice and our foreign healthcare and strategic consulting operations based in the Middle East.
How We Generate Revenues
A large portion of our revenues is generated by our full-time consultants who provide consulting services to our clients and are billable to our clients based on the number of hours worked. A smaller portion of our revenues is generated by our other professionals, also referred to as full-time equivalents, all of whom work variable schedules as needed by our clients. Other professionals include specialized finance and operational consultants and our document review and electronic data discovery groups, as well as full-time employees who provide software support and maintenance services to our clients. Our document review and electronic data discovery groups generate revenues primarily based on number of hours worked and units produced, such as pages reviewed or amount of data processed. We translate the hours that these other professionals work on client engagements into a full-time equivalent measure that we use to manage our business. We refer to our full-time consultants and other professionals collectively as revenue-generating professionals.
Revenues generated by our full-time consultants are primarily driven by the number of consultants we employ and their utilization rates, as well as the billing rates we charge our clients. Revenues generated by our other professionals, or full-time equivalents, are largely dependent on the number of consultants we employ, their hours worked and billing rates charged, as well as the number of pages reviewed and amount of data processed in the case of our document review and electronic data discovery groups, respectively.
We generate the majority of our revenues from providing professional services under four types of billing arrangements: time-and-expense, fixed-fee (including software license revenue), performance-based and support and maintenance for the software we deploy.
Time-and-expense billing arrangements require the client to pay based on either the number of hours worked, the number of pages reviewed, or the amount of data processed by our revenue-generating professionals at agreed upon rates. We recognize revenues under time-and-expense billing arrangements as the related services are rendered. Time-and-expense engagements represented 45.3% and 48.1% of our revenues in the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Time-and-expense engagements represented 46.3% and 48.1% of our revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
In fixed-fee billing arrangements, we agree to a pre-established fee in exchange for a pre-determined set of professional services, which may include the deployment of our proprietary software. We set the fees based on our estimates of the costs and timing for completing the engagements. It is the clients expectation in these engagements that the pre-established fee will not be exceeded except in mutually agreed upon circumstances. We generally recognize revenues under fixed-fee billing arrangements using a proportionate performance approach, which is based on our estimates of work completed to-date versus the total services to be provided under the engagement.
We generate revenues from licensing two types of proprietary software to clients. Licenses for our revenue cycle management software are sold only as a component of our consulting projects and the services we provide are essential to the functionality of the software. Therefore, revenues from the revenue cycle management software licenses are recognized over the term of the related consulting services contract in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605-35, Revenue Recognition. License revenue from our research administration and compliance software is recognized in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition, generally in the month in which the software is delivered.
21
For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, fixed-fee engagements (including software license revenue) represented approximately 37.8% and 31.8%, respectively, of our revenues. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, fixed-fee engagements represented approximately 38.5% and 35.6%, respectively, of our revenues.
In performance-based fee billing arrangements, fees are tied to the attainment of contractually defined objectives. We enter into performance-based engagements in essentially two forms. First, we generally earn fees that are directly related to the savings formally acknowledged by the client as a result of adopting our recommendations for improving operational and cost effectiveness in the areas we review. Second, we have performance-based engagements in which we earn a success fee when and if certain predefined outcomes occur. Often, performance-based fees supplement our time-and-expense or fixed-fee engagements. We do not recognize revenues under performance-based billing arrangements until all related performance criteria are met. Performance-based fee revenues represented 13.2% and 16.8% of our revenues in the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Performance-based fee revenues represented 11.8% and 12.7% of our revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Performance-based fee engagements may cause significant variations in quarterly revenues and operating results depending on the timing of achievement of the performance-based criteria.
Clients that have purchased one of our software licenses can pay an annual fee for software support and maintenance. Annual support and maintenance fee revenue is recognized ratably over the support period, which is generally one year. These fees are billed in advance and included in deferred revenues until recognized. Support and maintenance revenues represented 3.7% and 3.3% of our revenues in the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Support and maintenance revenues represented 3.4% and 3.6% of our revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Our quarterly results are impacted principally by our full-time consultants utilization rate, the billing rate we charge our clients, the number of our revenue-generating professionals who are available to work and the amount of performance-based fees recognized, which often vary significantly between quarters. Our utilization rate can be negatively affected by increased hiring because there is generally a transition period for new professionals that results in a temporary drop in our utilization rate. Our utilization rate can also be affected by seasonal variations in the demand for our services from our clients. For example, during the third and fourth quarters of the year, vacations taken by our clients can result in the deferral of activity on existing and new engagements, which would negatively affect our utilization rate. The number of business work days is also affected by the number of vacation days taken by our consultants and holidays in each quarter. We typically have fewer business work days available in the fourth quarter of the year, which can impact revenues during that period.
Time-and-expense engagements do not provide us with a high degree of predictability as to performance in future periods. Unexpected changes in the demand for our services can result in significant variations in utilization and revenues and present a challenge to optimal hiring and staffing. Moreover, our clients typically retain us on an engagement-by-engagement basis, rather than under long-term recurring contracts. The volume of work performed for any particular client can vary widely from period to period.
Business Strategy, Opportunities and Challenges
Our primary strategy is to meet the needs of our clients by providing a balanced portfolio of service offerings and capabilities, so that we can adapt quickly and effectively to emerging opportunities in the marketplace. To achieve this, we have entered into select acquisitions of complementary businesses and continue to hire highly qualified professionals.
To expand our business, we will remain focused on growing our existing relationships and developing new relationships, execute our managing director compensation plan to attract and retain senior practitioners, continue to promote and provide an integrated approach to service delivery, broaden the scope of our existing services, and acquire complementary businesses. We will regularly evaluate the performance of our practices to ensure our investments meet these objectives. Furthermore, we intend to enhance our visibility in the marketplace by refining our overarching messaging and value propositions for the organization as well as each practice. We will continue to focus on reaching our client base through clear, concise, endorsed messages.
We are considering an amendment to our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for grant so we may continue to attract and retain key business leaders and align their interests with those of our stockholders to drive future growth. It is likely that if we do so, we would request approval for an amount of shares that could be larger than the amount of shares approved by the shareholders in 2012.
22
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. We review our financial reporting and disclosure practices and accounting policies to ensure that our financial reporting and disclosures provide accurate information relative to the current economic and business environment. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make assessments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Critical accounting policies are those policies that we believe present the most complex or subjective measurements and have the most potential to impact our financial position and operating results. While all decisions regarding accounting policies are important, we believe that there are four accounting policies that could be considered critical. These critical accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts and unbilled services, carrying values of goodwill and other intangible assets, and valuation of net deferred tax assets. For a detailed discussion of these critical accounting policies, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Below is an update to our critical accounting policy relating to the carrying values of goodwill and other intangible assets. There have been no material changes to our other critical accounting policies during the first nine months of 2013.
Carrying Values of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
During the first quarter of 2013, we changed our internal financial reporting structure. Under the new structure, our former Health and Education Consulting segment became two separate segments: Huron Healthcare and Huron Education and Life Sciences. In addition, certain immaterial practices which were historically part of our Health and Education Consulting segment were combined and disclosed in our All Other segment. The Legal Consulting segment is now referred to as Huron Legal and the Financial Consulting segment is now referred to as Huron Financial. The structure of the Legal Consulting and Financial Consulting segments did not change. As a result of these changes, we now have five reporting segments, which are the same as our operating segments and reporting units.
In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other, we reassigned the goodwill balance of the Health and Education Consulting segment using the relative fair value approach based on an evaluation of expected future discounted cash flows. Based on this relative fair value analysis, we reassigned $355.9 million of goodwill to Huron Healthcare and $94.6 million of goodwill to Huron Education and Life Sciences.
In conjunction with the goodwill reassignment, we performed the first step of the goodwill impairment test for the goodwill balances within our Huron Healthcare and Huron Education and Life Sciences reporting units as of January 2, 2013. Based on the result of the first step of the goodwill impairment test, we determined that the fair values of our Huron Healthcare and Huron Education and Life Sciences reporting units exceeded their carrying values. Since the fair values of both reporting units exceeded their carrying values, the second step of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary.
In estimating the fair value of our Huron Healthcare and Huron Education and Life Sciences reporting units, we relied on a combination of the income approach and the market approach, utilizing the guideline company method, with a fifty-fifty weighting. For companies providing services similar to those provided by us, the income and market approaches will generally provide the most reliable indications of value because the value of such companies is dependent on their ability to generate earnings.
In the income approach, we utilized a discounted cash flow analysis, which involved estimating the expected after-tax cash flows that will be generated by our reporting units and then discounting those cash flows to present value reflecting the relevant risks associated with the reporting units and the time value of money. This approach requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including long-term projections of future cash flows, market conditions, discount rates reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, revenue growth, perpetual growth rates and profitability, among others. In estimating future cash flows, we relied on an internally generated six-year forecast. For periods after the six-year forecast, we assumed a 3.5% long-term annual revenue growth rate. Our forecast is based on our historical experience, current backlog, expected market demand, and other industry information. Our discounted cash flow analysis assumed a 13% weighted average cost of capital (WACC) discount rate for each reporting unit.
In the market approach, we utilized the guideline company method, which involved calculating valuation multiples based on operating data from guideline publicly traded companies. Multiples derived from guideline companies provide an indication of how much a knowledgeable investor in the marketplace would be willing to pay for a company. These multiples were then adjusted for factors similar to those used in a discounted cash flow analysis and applied to the operating data for our reporting units to arrive at an indication of value.
23
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires us to make significant judgments, estimates and assumptions. While we believe that the estimates and assumptions underlying our valuation methodology are reasonable, these estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on whether or not an impairment charge is recognized and also the magnitude of any such charge. The results of an impairment analysis are as of a point in time. There is no assurance that the actual future earnings or cash flows of our reporting units will not differ significantly from our projections. We will monitor any changes to our assumptions and will evaluate goodwill as deemed warranted during future periods. Any significant decline in our operations could result in goodwill impairment charges.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected segment and consolidated operating results and other operating data. Segment operating income consists of the revenues generated by a segment, less the direct costs of revenue and selling, general and administrative costs that are incurred directly by the segment. Unallocated costs include corporate costs related to administrative functions that are performed in a centralized manner that are not attributable to a particular segment.
During the first quarter of 2013, we changed our internal financial reporting structure. Under the new structure, our former Health and Education Consulting segment became two separate segments: Huron Healthcare and Huron Education and Life Sciences. In addition, certain immaterial practices which were historically part of our Health and Education Consulting segment were combined and disclosed in our All Other segment. The Legal Consulting segment is now referred to as Huron Legal and the Financial Consulting segment is now referred to as Huron Financial. The structure of the Legal Consulting and Financial Consulting segments did not change. As a result of these changes, we now have five reporting segments, which are the same as our operating segments. Certain amounts reported in the prior year have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
24
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Segment and Consolidated Operating Results (in thousands): |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues and reimbursable expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Huron Healthcare |
$ | 86,957 | $ | 74,999 | $ | 244,648 | $ | 201,171 | ||||||||
Huron Legal |
45,263 | 46,153 | 131,296 | 133,443 | ||||||||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
34,806 | 33,863 | 107,666 | 93,373 | ||||||||||||
Huron Financial |
7,223 | 6,689 | 25,068 | 16,821 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
486 | 184 | 500 | 388 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
174,735 | 161,888 | 509,178 | 445,196 | ||||||||||||
Total reimbursable expenses |
17,542 | 13,470 | 51,001 | 41,820 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues and reimbursable expenses |
$ | 192,277 | $ | 175,358 | $ | 560,179 | $ | 487,016 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Huron Healthcare |
$ | 30,772 | $ | 33,868 | $ | 91,440 | $ | 69,778 | ||||||||
Huron Legal |
15,138 | 11,479 | 28,869 | 33,489 | ||||||||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
7,773 | 12,406 | 28,672 | 28,051 | ||||||||||||
Huron Financial |
664 | 1,763 | 7,995 | 1,659 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
(285) | (428) | (701) | (1,971) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total segment operating income |
54,062 | 59,088 | 156,275 | 131,006 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses and gains not allocated to segments |
22,943 | 38,524 | 73,264 | 92,104 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating income |
$ | 31,119 | $ | 20,564 | $ | 83,011 | $ | 38,902 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other Operating Data (excluding All Other): |
||||||||||||||||
Number of full-time billable consultants (at period end) (1): |
||||||||||||||||
Huron Healthcare (5) |
942 | 835 | 942 | 835 | ||||||||||||
Huron Legal |
143 | 134 | 143 | 134 | ||||||||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
425 | 406 | 425 | 406 | ||||||||||||
Huron Financial |
62 | 65 | 62 | 65 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total (5) |
1,572 | 1,440 | 1,572 | 1,440 | ||||||||||||
Average number of full-time billable consultants (for the period) (1): |
||||||||||||||||
Huron Healthcare (5) |
926 | 824 | 891 | 807 | ||||||||||||
Huron Legal |
146 | 128 | 146 | 122 | ||||||||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
425 | 386 | 431 | 352 | ||||||||||||
Huron Financial |
62 | 67 | 62 | 68 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total (5) |
1,559 | 1,405 | 1,530 | 1,349 | ||||||||||||
Full-time billable consultant utilization rate (2): |
||||||||||||||||
Huron Healthcare (5) |
80.2% | 76.1% | 83.5% | 79.2% | ||||||||||||
Huron Legal |
62.3% | 66.9% | 58.1% | 68.8% | ||||||||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
64.4% | 73.9% | 66.7% | 72.7% | ||||||||||||
Huron Financial |
73.6% | 56.9% | 80.5% | 55.2% | ||||||||||||
Total (5) |
73.9% | 73.8% | 76.2% | 75.4% |
25
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Other Operating Data (continued): |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Full-time billable consultant average billing rate per hour (3): |
||||||||||||||||
Huron Healthcare (5) |
$ | 230 | $ | 243 | $ | 211 | $ | 210 | ||||||||
Huron Legal |
$ | 271 | $ | 265 | $ | 239 | $ | 246 | ||||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
$ | 215 | $ | 214 | $ | 215 | $ | 212 | ||||||||
Huron Financial |
$ | 331 | $ | 368 | $ | 337 | $ | 306 | ||||||||
Total (5) |
$ | 234 | $ | 241 | $ | 219 | $ | 217 | ||||||||
Revenue per full-time billable consultant (in thousands): |
||||||||||||||||
Huron Healthcare (5) |
$ | 87 | $ | 85 | $ | 254 | $ | 229 | ||||||||
Huron Legal |
$ | 77 | $ | 81 | $ | 190 | $ | 238 | ||||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
$ | 64 | $ | 74 | $ | 204 | $ | 224 | ||||||||
Huron Financial |
$ | 112 | $ | 96 | $ | 388 | $ | 238 | ||||||||
Total (5) |
$ | 81 | $ | 82 | $ | 239 | $ | 229 | ||||||||
Average number of full-time equivalents (for the period) (4): |
||||||||||||||||
Huron Healthcare (5) |
53 | 55 | 54 | 59 | ||||||||||||
Huron Legal |
963 | 1,082 | 1,011 | 981 | ||||||||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
47 | 33 | 44 | 30 | ||||||||||||
Huron Financial |
3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total (5) |
1,066 | 1,173 | 1,112 | 1,071 | ||||||||||||
Revenue per full-time equivalent (in thousands): |
||||||||||||||||
Huron Healthcare (5) |
$ | 123 | $ | 96 | $ | 342 | $ | 285 | ||||||||
Huron Legal |
$ | 35 | $ | 33 | $ | 102 | $ | 106 | ||||||||
Huron Education and Life Sciences |
$ | 159 | $ | 164 | $ | 442 | $ | 484 | ||||||||
Huron Financial |
$ | 106 | $ | 77 | $ | 429 | $ | 648 | ||||||||
Total (5) |
$ | 45 | $ | 40 | $ | 128 | $ | 127 |
(1) | Consists of our full-time professionals who provide consulting services and generate revenues based on the number of hours worked. |
(2) | Utilization rate for our full-time billable consultants is calculated by dividing the number of hours all of our full-time billable consultants worked on client assignments during a period by the total available working hours for all of these consultants during the same period, assuming a forty-hour work week, less paid holidays and vacation days. |
(3) | Average billing rate per hour for our full-time billable consultants is calculated by dividing revenues for a period by the number of hours worked on client assignments during the same period. |
(4) | Consists of consultants who work variable schedules as needed by our clients, as well as other professionals who generate revenues primarily based on number of hours worked and units produced, such as pages reviewed and data processed. Also includes full-time employees who provide software support and maintenance services to our clients. |
(5) | Effective January 1, 2013, a group within the Huron Healthcare segment that provides post-implementation services that was previously classified as full-time equivalents is now classified as full-time billable consultants due to the evolving nature of the services that they offer. Prior periods have been revised to reflect this change. |
Non-GAAP Measures
We also assess our results of operations using certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures differ from GAAP because the non-GAAP financial measures we calculate to measure Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income from continuing operations, and Adjusted diluted earnings per share exclude a number of items required by GAAP, each discussed below. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, any measure of performance, cash flows or liquidity prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our non-GAAP financial measures may be defined differently from time to time and may be defined differently than similar terms used by other companies, and accordingly, care should be exercised in understanding how we define our non-GAAP financial measures.
26
Our management uses the non-GAAP financial measures to gain an understanding of our comparative operating performance, for example when comparing such results with previous periods or forecasts. These non-GAAP financial measures are used by management in their financial and operating decision making because management believes they reflect our ongoing business in a manner that allows for meaningful period-to-period comparisons. Management also uses these non-GAAP financial measures when publicly providing our business outlook, for internal management purposes, and as a basis for evaluating potential acquisitions and dispositions. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating Hurons current operating performance and future prospects in the same manner as management does and in comparing in a consistent manner Hurons current financial results with Hurons past financial results.
The reconciliations of these financial measures from GAAP to non-GAAP are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 174,735 | $ | 161,888 | $ | 509,178 | $ | 445,196 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 17,161 | $ | 10,416 | $ | 44,344 | $ | 17,308 | ||||||||
Add back: |
||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
12,531 | 7,972 | 33,532 | 15,707 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other expenses |
1,427 | 2,176 | 5,135 | 5,887 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,643 | 5,666 | 16,631 | 16,656 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) |
36,762 | 26,230 | 99,642 | 55,558 | ||||||||||||
Add back: |
||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 2,194 | 596 | 3,253 | ||||||||||||
Restatement related expenses |
| 68 | | 1,785 | ||||||||||||
Litigation settlement (gain) loss |
(5,300) | | (6,450) | 1,150 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
| 13,083 | | 13,083 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 31,462 | $ | 41,575 | $ | 93,788 | $ | 74,829 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenues |
18.0% | 25.7% | 18.4% | 16.8% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 17,161 | $ | 10,416 | $ | 44,344 | $ | 17,308 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average shares diluted |
22,873 | 22,326 | 22,712 | 22,247 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
$ | 0.75 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 0.78 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Add back: |
||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
1,440 | 1,923 | 4,347 | 5,149 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 2,194 | 596 | 3,253 | ||||||||||||
Restatement related expenses |
| 68 | | 1,785 | ||||||||||||
Litigation settlement (gain) loss |
(5,300) | | (6,450) | 1,150 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
| 13,083 | | 13,083 | ||||||||||||
Tax effect |
1,544 | (6,840) | 603 | (9,701) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total adjustments, net of tax |
(2,316) | 10,428 | (904) | 14,719 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted net income from continuing operations |
$ | 14,845 | $ | 20,844 | $ | 43,440 | $ | 32,027 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.93 | $ | 1.91 | $ | 1.44 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These non-GAAP financial measures include adjustments for the following items:
Restructuring charges: We have incurred charges due to the restructuring of various parts of our business. These restructuring charges have primarily consisted of severance charges, costs associated with office space reductions including the accelerated depreciation of certain leasehold improvements, and the write-off of certain impaired intangible assets. We have excluded the effect of the restructuring charges from our non-GAAP measures as a means to provide comparability with periods that were not impacted by a restructuring charge. Additionally, the amount of each restructuring charge is significantly affected by the timing and size of the restructured business or component of a business.
27
Restatement related expenses: We have incurred significant expenses related to our 2009 financial statement restatement. We have excluded the effect of these restatement related expenses from our non-GAAP measures as a means to provide comparability with periods that were not impacted by the restatement related expenses.
Litigation settlement (gain) loss: We have excluded the effect of the litigation settlements to permit comparability with periods that were not impacted by these items.
Amortization of intangible assets: We have excluded the effect of amortization of intangible assets from the calculation of Adjusted net income from continuing operations presented above. Amortization of intangibles is inconsistent in its amount and frequency and is significantly affected by the timing and size of our acquisitions.
Goodwill impairment charges: We have excluded the effects of goodwill impairment charges to permit comparability with periods that were not impacted by such charges.
Tax effect: The non-GAAP income tax adjustment reflects the incremental tax rate applicable to the non-GAAP adjustments.
Income tax expense, Interest and other expenses, Depreciation and amortization: We have excluded the effects of income tax expense, interest and other expenses, and depreciation and amortization in the calculation of EBITDA as these are customary exclusions as defined by the calculation of EBITDA to arrive at meaningful earnings from core operations excluding the effect of such items.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
Revenues
Revenues increased $12.8 million, or 7.9%, to $174.7 million for the third quarter of 2013 from $161.9 million for the third quarter of 2012.
Of the overall $12.8 million increase in revenues, $11.0 million was attributable to our full-time billable consultants, while $1.8 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The increase in full-time billable consultant revenues was driven by an increase in the average number of billable consultants, partially offset by a decrease in the average billing rate. The increase primarily reflected strengthened demand for our services in the Huron Healthcare segment. The increase in full-time equivalent revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in the revenues per full-time equivalent, partially offset by a decrease in the average number of full-time equivalents. Revenue attributable to full-time equivalents primarily reflected increased use of contractors in the Huron Education and Life Sciences and Huron Healthcare segments, partially offset by decreased demand for our document review services in the Huron Legal segment.
Total Direct Costs
Our total direct costs increased $16.7 million, or 18.5%, to $106.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $90.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was primarily related to a $19.9 million increase in salaries, bonuses, and related expenses for our revenue-generating professionals, partially offset by a $2.4 million decrease in contractor expense and a $0.6 million decrease in technology expense. As a percentage of revenues, our total direct costs increased to 61.1% during the third quarter of 2013 compared to 55.6% during the third quarter of 2012. This primarily reflected an increase in salaries, bonuses, and related expenses for our revenue-generating professionals as a percentage of revenues during the third quarter of 2013, partially offset by the decrease in contractor expense and technology expense.
Total direct costs for the three months ended September 30, 2013 included $2.8 million of share-based compensation expense and $0.7 million of amortization expense for intangible assets and software development costs, primarily representing customer-related assets and software acquired in business combinations. Total direct costs for the three months ended September 30, 2012 included $1.8 million of share-based compensation expense and $0.8 million of intangible asset amortization expense. The increase in share-based compensation expense was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of awards expected to be earned based on 2013 performance compared to those that were expected to be earned, as of September 30, 2012, based on 2012 performance.
Operating Expenses and Other Operating Gains
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $6.1 million, or 19.6%, to $37.2 million in the third quarter of 2013 from $31.1 million in the third quarter of 2012. This increase was primarily related to a $4.1 million increase in salaries,
28
bonuses, and related expenses for our support personnel, a $1.4 million increase in practice administration and meetings expense, a $0.6 million increase in accounting, tax, and audit fees, and a $0.3 million increase in promotion and sponsorship expenses. These increases were partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease in facilities and other office related expenses. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 21.3% during the third quarter of 2013 compared to 19.2% during the third quarter of 2012. This increase primarily reflected, as a percentage of revenue, an increase in salaries, bonuses, and related expenses for our support personnel, practice administration and meetings expenses, and accounting, tax, and audit fees, partially offset by the decrease in facilities and other office related expenses.
We did not incur a restructuring expense during the third quarter of 2013. During the third quarter of 2012, we incurred $2.2 million in restructuring expense primarily related to the consolidation of office space in the Washington, D.C. area as a result of the AdamsGrayson acquisition, accelerated depreciation on leasehold improvements at our New York office location, which we relocated during the fourth quarter of 2012, and brokerage fees related to the execution of a sublease agreement for the New York office space.
Litigation settlement gain was $5.3 million for the third quarter of 2013. During the third quarter of 2013, we reached a settlement agreement to resolve a lawsuit brought by Huron, resulting in a gain of $5.3 million being recorded. We collected $2.6 million of the settlement amount during the fourth quarter of 2013, and we anticipate the remaining amount will be collected during the first quarter of 2014. The settlement receivable is recorded in Prepaid expenses and other current assets.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $0.1 million to $5.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $4.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Non-direct intangible asset amortization relates to non-competition agreements, certain customer relationships, and trade names acquired in connection with our acquisitions.
During the third quarter of 2012, we recorded a $13.1 million goodwill impairment charge related to our Huron Financial segment. See Note 5 Goodwill and Intangible Assets of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further discussion of the goodwill impairment charge.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $10.5 million, or 51.3%, to $31.1 million in the third quarter of 2013 from $20.6 million in the third quarter of 2012. Operating margin, which is defined as operating income expressed as a percentage of revenues, increased to 17.8% in the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 12.7% in the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in operating margin was primarily attributable to the decrease in the goodwill impairment charge and the recognition of the litigation settlement gain during the third quarter of 2013, as well as decreases in contractor expense, restructuring expense, and facilities and other office related expenses. These increases in the operating margin were partially offset by the increases in salaries, bonuses, and related expenses for both our revenue-generating professionals and our support personnel as a percentage of revenue during the period.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net decreased by $0.8 million to $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2013 from $2.2 million in the third quarter of 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $0.8 million, or 33.8%, decrease in interest expense in the third quarter of 2013, which was the result of a decrease in our borrowing levels combined with lower interest rates.
Income Tax Expense
For the third quarter of 2013, we recognized income tax expense from continuing operations of $12.5 million on income from continuing operations of $29.7 million. For the third quarter of 2012, we recognized income tax expense from continuing operations of $8.0 million on income from continuing operations of $18.4 million. Our effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2013 was 42.2% compared with 43.4% in 2012. The effective tax rate for both periods was higher than the statutory rate, inclusive of state income taxes, due primarily to the impact of foreign losses with no tax benefit and certain non-deductible business expenses, partially offset by certain credits and deductions.
Net Income from Continuing Operations
Net income from continuing operations was $17.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to net income from continuing operations of $10.4 million for the same period last year. The increase in net income from continuing operations was primarily due to the increase in operating income, as discussed above, partially offset by the corresponding increase in income tax expense. As a result of the increase in net income from continuing operations, diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the third quarter of 2013 was $0.75 compared to diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $0.47 for the third quarter of 2012.
29
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA increased $10.6 million to $36.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $26.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Adjusted EBITDA decreased $10.1 million to $31.5 million in the third quarter of 2013 from $41.6 million in the third quarter of 2012. The increase in EBITDA was primarily due to the decrease in goodwill impairment charge and the recognition of the litigation settlement gain, partially offset by the decrease in segment operating income, as discussed below in Segment Results. Adjusted EBITDA was lower in the third quarter of 2013 due to the decrease in segment operating income.
Adjusted Net Income from Continuing Operations
Adjusted net income from continuing operations was $14.8 million in the third quarter of 2013 compared to $20.8 million in the third quarter of 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to the decrease in segment operating income.
Segment Results
Huron Healthcare
Revenues
Huron Healthcare segment revenues increased $12.0 million, or 15.9%, to $87.0 million for the third quarter of 2013 from $75.0 million for the third quarter of 2012. Revenues from time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements, performance-based arrangements, and software support and maintenance arrangements represented 1.6%, 67.1%, 25.9%, and 5.4%, respectively, of this segments revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 1.4%, 57.4%, 35.9%, and 5.3%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2012.
Of the overall $12.0 million increase in revenues, $10.8 million was attributable to our full-time billable consultants and $1.2 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The increase in demand for our services reflected the increased pressures our clients face as the result of evolving business models, rising costs, and declining reimbursements from government and commercial payers. The increase in full-time billable consultant revenues reflected increases in the average number of full-time billable consultants and consultant utilization rate, partially offset by a decrease in the average billing rate. Performance-based fee revenues were $22.5 million during the third quarter of 2013 compared to $26.9 million during the third quarter of 2012. Performance-based fee engagements may cause significant variations in quarterly revenues, operating results and average billing rates due to the timing of achievement of the performance-based criteria.
Operating Income
Huron Healthcare segment operating income decreased $3.1 million, or 9.1%, to $30.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $33.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. The Huron Healthcare segment operating margin, defined as segment operating income expressed as a percentage of segment revenues, decreased to 35.4% for the third quarter of 2013 from 45.2% in the same period last year. The decrease in this segments operating margin was primarily attributable to an increase in bonus expense for our revenue-generating professionals as a percentage of revenues, partially offset by decreases in severance expense and contractor expense.
Huron Legal
Revenues
Huron Legal segment revenues decreased $0.9 million, or 1.9%, to $45.3 million for the third quarter of 2013 from $46.2 million for the third quarter of 2012. Revenues from time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements, and support and maintenance arrangements represented 95.9%, 3.4%, and 0.7%, respectively, of this segments revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 95.9%, 3.8%, and 0.3%, respectively, of this segments revenues for the comparable period in 2012.
Of the overall $0.9 million decrease in revenues, $1.8 million was attributable to a decrease in revenue generated by our full-time equivalents, partially offset by a $0.9 million increase in revenue generated by our full-time billable consultants. The decrease in revenue attributable to our full-time equivalents was the result of a decrease in the average number of full-time equivalents, partially offset by an increase in revenue per full-time equivalent. The increase in full-time billable consultant revenue reflected an increase in the average number of full-time billable consultants and average billing rate, partially offset by a decrease in the consultant utilization rate.
30
Operating Income
Huron Legal segment operating income increased by $3.6 million, or 31.9%, to $15.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $11.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Segment operating margin increased to 33.4% for the third quarter of 2013 from 24.9% in the same period last year. The increase in this segments operating margin was primarily attributable to a decrease in contractor expense as a percentage of revenues. Decreases in restructuring expense, technology expense, and rent expense as percentages of revenues also contributed to the increase in operating margin, partially offset by increases in salaries and related expenses for both our revenue-generating professionals and support personnel.
Huron Education and Life Sciences
Revenues
Huron Education and Life Sciences segment revenues increased $0.9 million, or 2.8%, to $34.8 million for the third quarter of 2013 from $33.9 million for the third quarter of 2012. Revenues from time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements, and software support and maintenance arrangements represented 84.3%, 11.6%, and 4.1%, respectively, of this segments revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 82.1%, 14.2%, and 3.7%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2012.
Of the overall $0.9 million increase in revenues, $2.0 million was attributable to an increase in revenue generated by our full-time equivalents, partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in revenue generated by our full-time billable consultants. The overall increase in demand for our services in the Huron Education and Life Sciences segment reflected the increased competitive pressures faced by our clients as the result of increased regulation, rising costs, and declining funding. The decrease in revenue from our full-time billable consultants reflected a decrease in the consultant utilization rate, partially offset by an increase in the average number of full-time billable consultants. The increase in revenue attributable to our full-time equivalents was driven by an increase in the average number of full-time equivalents, partially offset by a decrease in revenue per full-time equivalent.
Operating Income
Huron Education and Life Sciences segment operating income decreased $4.6 million, or 37.3%, to $7.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $12.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. The Huron Education and Life Sciences segment operating margin decreased to 22.3% for the third quarter of 2013 from 36.6% in the same period last year. The decrease in this segments operating margin was primarily attributable to increases in salaries and related expenses for both our revenue-generating professionals and support personnel and contractor expense as percentages of revenues. Increases in practice administration and meetings expense, severance expense, and promotion and sponsorship expense as percentages of revenue also contributed to the decrease in operating margin, partially offset by a decrease in bonus expense for our revenue-generating professionals.
Huron Financial
Revenues
Huron Financial segment revenues increased $0.5 million, or 8.0%, to $7.2 million for the third quarter of 2013 from $6.7 million for the third quarter of 2012. Revenues from time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements, and performance-based arrangements represented 71.4%, 22.0%, and 6.6%, respectively, of this segments revenues during the third quarter of 2013 compared to 70.1%, 26.2%, and 3.7%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2012.
The overall $0.5 million increase in revenues was attributable to our full-time billable consultants and reflected a higher consultant utilization rate, partially offset by decreases in the average billing rate and average number of full-time billable consultants. The overall increase in revenues is attributable to an increase in demand for our restructuring and turnaround and operational improvement consulting services.
Operating Income
Huron Financial segment operating income decreased by $1.1 million, or 62.3%, to $0.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $1.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Segment operating margin decreased to 9.2% for the third quarter of 2013 from 26.4% in the same period last year. The decrease in this segments operating margin was primarily attributable to an increase in bonus expense for our revenue-generating professionals as a percentage of revenues, partially offset by a decrease in salaries and related expenses for our revenue-generating professionals as a percentage of revenues.
31
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Revenues
Revenues increased $64.0 million, or 14.4%, to $509.2 million for the first nine months of 2013 from $445.2 million for the first nine months of 2012.
Of the $64.0 million increase in revenues, $57.6 million was attributable to our full-time billable consultants and $6.4 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The increase in full-time billable consultant revenues was driven by increases in the average number of billable consultants, our average billing rate, and our consultant utilization rate. The increase primarily reflected strengthened demand for our services in the Huron Healthcare, Huron Education and Life Sciences and Huron Financial segments, partially offset by a decrease in demand for our advisory services in the Huron Legal segment. The increase in full-time equivalent revenue was attributable to increases in the average number of full-time equivalents and revenue per full-time equivalent. Revenue attributable to full-time equivalents reflected increased use of contractors in the Huron Education and Life Sciences, Huron Healthcare and Huron Financial segments, partially offset by decreased demand for our document review services in the Huron Legal segment.
Total Direct Costs
Our total direct costs increased $36.1 million, or 12.8%, to $317.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $281.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was primarily related to a $45.3 million increase in salaries, bonuses, and related expenses for our revenue-generating professionals, partially offset by a $7.0 million decrease in contractor expense, a $1.2 million decrease in technology expense, and a $1.2 million decrease in intangible asset amortization expense. As a percentage of revenues, our total direct costs decreased to 62.3% during the first nine months of 2013 compared to 63.1% during the first nine months of 2012. This primarily reflected the decrease in contractor expense, technology expense, and intangible asset amortization expense, partially offset by the increase in bonus expense for our revenue-generating professionals as a percentage of revenues during the first nine months of 2013.
Total direct costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 included $9.7 million of share-based compensation expense compared to $8.2 million of share-based compensation during the same period last year. The increase in share-based compensation expense was primarily driven by an increase in the number of awards expected to be earned based on 2013 performance compared to those that were expected to be earned, as of September 30, 2012, based on 2012 performance. As discussed in Note 2 Basis of Presentation under Part I Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in the second quarter of 2013, we identified a $1.1 million error in stock-based compensation expense resulting from the use of the straight-line attribution method for performance awards with graded vesting features granted in prior periods. The $1.1 million pretax adjustment, which represents the cumulative error related to all prior period financial statements beginning with the first quarter of 2010 through the first quarter of 2013, resulted in a $0.9 million increase in Direct costs and a $0.2 million increase in Selling, general and administrative expense. After consideration of both quantitative and qualitative factors, we concluded that our previously issued annual and quarterly financial statements for the years 2010, 2011, 2012 and the first quarter of 2013 were not materially misstated, and the effect of recognizing this adjustment during the second quarter of 2013 was not material for the period then ended and is not expected to be material for the full year 2013 results.
Total direct costs for the first nine months of 2013 also included $2.0 million of amortization expense for intangible assets and software development costs, primarily representing customer-related assets and software acquired in business combinations, compared to $3.1 million of intangible asset amortization expense for the first nine months of 2012. The decrease in intangible asset amortization expense was primarily attributable to certain intangible assets that became fully amortized during the third quarter of 2012, partially offset by the amortization of intangible assets acquired during the second half of 2012.
Operating Expenses and Other Operating Gains
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $7.9 million, or 8.5%, to $100.3 million in the first nine months of 2013 from $92.4 million in the first nine months of 2012. This increase was primarily related to an $8.1 million increase in salaries, bonuses, and related expenses for our support personnel, a $1.2 million increase in practice administration and meetings expenses, a $0.8 million increase in accounting, tax, and audit fees, and a $0.6 million increase in computer equipment and software license expenses. These increases were partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease in facilities and other office related expenses, a $1.0 million decrease in legal expenses, and a $0.7 million decrease in training costs. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 19.7% during the first nine months of 2013 compared to 20.8% during the first nine months of 2012. This decrease primarily reflected the decreases in facilities and other office related expenses, legal expenses, and training costs, as well as our revenue growth that outpaced the growth in promotion and sponsorship expenses during the first nine months of 2013, partially offset by an increase in bonus expense for our support personnel as a percentage of revenues.
32
In the first nine months of 2013, we recorded a $0.6 million restructuring expense related to the consolidation of office space in the Washington, D.C. area. This office space was acquired in the AdamsGrayson acquisition that occurred in the second half of 2012. During the first nine months of 2012, we recorded $3.3 million in restructuring expense, primarily consisting of accelerated depreciation on leasehold improvements at our New York office location, which we relocated during the fourth quarter of 2012, brokerage fees related to the execution of a sublease arrangement for this space, and charges related to the consolidation of additional office space in the Washington, D.C. area, also as a result of the AdamsGrayson acquisition. These charges during the first nine months of 2012 were partially offset by the net favorable impact of updated assumptions for lease accruals related to previously vacated office spaces. See Note 8 Restructuring Charges in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for further discussion of our restructuring expense.
We did not incur restatement related expenses during the first nine months of 2013. During the first nine months of 2012, we incurred $1.8 million of restatement related expenses, primarily consisting of legal fees.
We recorded litigation settlement gains of $6.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to litigation settlement loss of $1.2 million during the same period last year. During the third quarter of 2013, we reached a settlement agreement to resolve a lawsuit brought by Huron, resulting in a gain of $5.3 million being recorded. We collected $2.6 million of the settlement amount during the fourth quarter of 2013, and we anticipate the remaining amount will be collected during the first quarter of 2014. During the second quarter of 2012, we conducted preliminary settlement discussions with the relator in the qui tam action discussed in Legal Proceedings and in Note 13 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees, and as a result, we recorded a charge of $1.2 million, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. On March 8, 2013, the Court granted Hurons motion for summary judgment and dismissed the relators second amended complaint in its entirety with prejudice. As a result, during the first quarter of 2013, we reversed the charge of $1.2 million taken during 2012.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $1.0 million to $14.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $13.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was primarily related to the depreciation of servers and network equipment placed into service in the fourth quarter of 2012 and first half of 2013 and amortization of intangible assets acquired during the second half of 2012, partially offset by certain intangible assets that became fully amortized during the second half of 2012. Non-direct intangible asset amortization relates to customer relationships, non-competition agreements and trade names acquired in connection with our acquisitions.
During the third quarter of 2012, we recorded a $13.1 million goodwill impairment charge related to our Huron Financial segment. See Note 5 Goodwill and Intangible Assets of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further discussion of the goodwill impairment charge.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $44.1 million, or 113.4%, to $83.0 million in the first nine months of 2013 from $38.9 million in the first nine months of 2012. Operating margin, which is defined as operating income expressed as a percentage of revenues, increased to 16.3% in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 8.7% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to the decreases in contractor expense, facilities and other office related expenses, restructuring expense, restatement related expenses, technology expense, and intangible asset amortization expense, partially offset by an increase in bonus expense for both our revenue-generating professionals and our support personnel as a percentage of revenue during the first nine months of 2013. The operating margin for the first nine months of 2013 was also favorably impacted by the litigation settlement gains in the period, while the operating margin in the first nine months of 2012 was negatively impacted by the goodwill impairment charge and litigation settlement loss in that period.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net decreased $0.8 million, or 12.8%, to $5.1 million in the first nine months of 2013 from $5.9 million in the first nine months of 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $1.1 million, or 17.6%, decrease in interest expense in the first nine months of 2013, which was the result of a decrease in our borrowing levels combined with lower interest rates during the period.
33
Income Tax Expense
For the first nine months of 2013, we recognized income tax expense from continuing operations of $33.5 million on income from continuing operations of $77.9 million. For the first nine months of 2012, we recognized income tax expense from continuing operations of $15.7 million on income from continuing operations of $33.0 million. Our effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2013 was 43.1% compared with 47.6% in 2012. The effective tax rate during the first nine months of 2013 was higher than the statutory rate, inclusive of state income taxes, due primarily to the impact of foreign losses with no tax benefit and certain non-deductible business expenses, partially offset by the impact of certain credits and deductions. The effective tax rate in the first nine months of 2012 was higher than the statutory rate, inclusive of state income taxes, primarily due to the impact of foreign losses with no tax benefit, partially offset by the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions. The foreign losses with no tax benefit and the non-deductible expenses had a larger impact on our effective tax rate in the first nine months of 2012 compared to 2013 due to the lower pretax income from continuing operations in the first nine months of 2012.
Net Income from Continuing Operations
Net income from continuing operations was $44.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to net income from continuing operations of $17.3 million for the same period last year. The increase in net income from continuing operations was primarily due to the increase in operating income, as discussed above, partially offset by the corresponding increase in income tax expense. As a result of the increase in net income from continuing operations, diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the first nine months of 2013 was $1.95 compared to diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $0.78 for the first nine months of 2012.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA increased $44.0 million to $99.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $55.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Adjusted EBITDA increased $19.0 million to $93.8 million in the first nine months of 2013 from $74.8 million in the same period last year. The increase in EBITDA was primarily driven by the increases in segment operating income of our Huron Healthcare, Huron Financial and Huron Education and Life Sciences segments, partially offset by the decrease in segment operating income of our Huron Legal segment, as discussed below in Segment Results. The increase in EBITDA was also due to the decrease in goodwill impairment charge and increase in litigation settlement gains. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to the increase in segment operating income.
Adjusted Net Income from Continuing Operations
Adjusted net income from continuing operations was $43.4 million in the first nine months of 2013 compared to $32.0 million in the first nine months of 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to the increase in segment operating income.
Segment Results
Huron Healthcare
Revenues
Huron Healthcare segment revenues increased $43.4 million, or 21.6%, to $244.6 million for the first nine months of 2013 from $201.2 million for the first nine months of 2012. Revenues from time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements, performance-based arrangements, and software support and maintenance arrangements represented 1.6%, 69.2%, 24.1%, and 5.1%, respectively, of this segments revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 1.2%, 64.8%, 28.0%, and 6.0%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2012.
Of the overall $43.4 million increase in revenues, $41.7 million was attributable to our full-time billable consultants and $1.7 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The increase in demand for our services reflected the increased pressures our clients face as the result of evolving business models, rising costs, and declining reimbursements from government and commercial payers. The increase in full-time billable consultant revenues reflected increases in the average number of full-time billable consultants, consultant utilization rate, and average billing rate. Performance-based fee revenues were $59.0 million during the first nine months of 2013 compared to $56.3 million during the first nine months of 2012. Performance-based fee engagements may cause significant variations in quarterly revenues, operating results and average billing rates due to the timing of achievement of the performance-based criteria. With regard to our full-time equivalents, this segment experienced an increase in revenue per full-time equivalent, partially offset by a decrease in the average number of full-time equivalents during the first nine months of 2013 compared to the same period of 2012.
34
Operating Income
Huron Healthcare segment operating income increased $21.6 million, or 31.0%, to $91.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $69.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Huron Healthcare segment operating margin, defined as segment operating income expressed as a percentage of segment revenues, increased to 37.4% for the first nine months of 2013 from 34.7% in the same period last year. The increase in this segments operating margin was primarily attributable to revenue growth that outpaced the increase in salaries and related expenses for our revenue generating professionals, as well as decreases in technology expense, legal expense, intangible asset amortization expense, contractor expense, and severance expense, partially offset by an increase in bonus expense for our revenue-generating professionals as a percentage of revenues.
Huron Legal
Revenues
Huron Legal segment revenues decreased $2.1 million, or 1.6%, to $131.3 million for the first nine months of 2013 from $133.4 million for the first nine months of 2012. Revenues from time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements, and software support and maintenance arrangements represented 95.3%, 4.2%, and 0.5%, respectively, of this segments revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 95.8%, 4.1%, and 0.1%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2012.
Of the overall $2.1 million decrease in revenues, $1.2 million was attributable to our full-time billable consultants and $0.9 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The decrease in full-time billable consultant revenue reflected lower consultant utilization and average billing rates, slightly offset by an increase in the average number of full-time billable consultants. The decrease in revenue attributable to our full-time equivalents was driven by a decrease in revenue per full-time equivalent, partially offset by an increase in the average number of full-time equivalents.
Operating Income
Huron Legal segment operating income decreased by $4.6 million, or 13.8%, to $28.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $33.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Segment operating margin decreased to 22.0% for the first nine months of 2013 from 25.1% in the same period last year. The decrease in this segments operating margin was primarily attributable to increases in salaries and related expenses for both our revenue-generating professionals and support personnel, as well as increases in technology expense and promotion and sponsorship expenses, largely offset by decreases in contractor expense, bonus expense for our revenue-generating professionals, and restructuring expense as percentages of revenues.
Huron Education and Life Sciences
Revenues
Huron Education and Life Sciences segment revenues increased $14.3 million, or 15.3%, to $107.7 million for the first nine months of 2013 from $93.4 million for the first nine months of 2012. Revenues from time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements, and software support and maintenance arrangements represented 81.1%, 15.0%, and 3.9%, respectively, of this segments revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 76.5%, 19.5%, and 4.0%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2012.
Of the overall $14.3 million increase in revenues, $9.3 million was attributable to our full-time billable consultants and $5.0 million was related to our full-time equivalents. The overall increase in demand for our services in the Huron Education and Life Sciences segment reflected the increased competitive pressures faced by our clients as the result of increased regulation, rising costs, and declining funding. The increase in revenues from our full-time billable consultants reflected increases in the average number of full-time billable consultants and the average billing rate, partially offset by a decrease in the consultant utilization rate. The increase in revenue attributable to our full-time equivalents was driven by an increase in the average number of full-time equivalents, partially offset by a decrease in revenue per full-time equivalent.
Operating Income
Huron Education and Life Sciences segment operating income increased $0.6 million, or 2.2%, to $28.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $28.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Huron Education and Life Sciences segment operating margin decreased to 26.6% for the first nine months of 2013 from 30.0% in the same period last year. The decrease in this segments operating margin was primarily attributable to increases in contractor expense, salaries and related expenses for our revenue-generating professionals, and practice administration and meetings expense, all as percentages of revenues, partially offset by decreases in bonus expense for our revenue-generating professionals and intangible asset amortization expense.
35
Huron Financial
Revenues
Huron Financial segment revenues increased $8.3 million, or 49.0%, to $25.1 million for the first nine months of 2013 from $16.8 million for the first nine months of 2012. Revenues from time-and-expense engagements, fixed-fee engagements, and performance-based arrangements represented 77.1%, 19.0%, and 3.9%, respectively, of this segments revenues during the first nine months of 2013 compared to 73.9%, 24.6%, and 1.5%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2012.
Of the overall $8.3 million increase in revenues, $7.8 million was attributable to our full-time billable consultants and $0.5 million was attributable to our full-time equivalents. The increase in revenues from our full-time billable consultants reflected an increase in the consultant utilization rate and average billing rate, partially offset by a decrease in the average number of full-time billable consultants. The increase in revenue attributable to our full-time equivalents was driven by an increase in the average number of full-time equivalents, partially offset by a decrease in revenue per full-time equivalent. Performance-based fee revenues were $1.0 million during the first nine months of 2013 compared to $0.3 million during the first nine months of 2012. The overall increase in revenues is attributable to an increase in demand for our restructuring and turnaround and operational improvement consulting services. The increased demand within this segment is partially a result of the initiatives we undertook during 2012, including broadening our service offerings and increasing marketing efforts, which were intended to increase demand for our services and improve the segments financial performance.
Operating Income
Huron Financial segment operating income increased by $6.3 million to $8.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $1.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Segment operating margin increased to 31.9% for the first nine months of 2013 from 9.9% in the same period last year. The increase in this segments operating margin was primarily attributable to a decrease in salaries and related expenses for both our revenue-generating professionals and support personnel and a decrease in promotion and sponsorship expense, partially offset by an increase in bonus expense for both our revenue-generating professionals and support personnel as a percentage of revenues.
36
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents increased $5.6 million, from $25.2 million at December 31, 2012 to $30.8 million at September 30, 2013. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations and debt capacity available under our credit facility.
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
Cash Flows (in thousands): |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 45,291 | $ | 42,850 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
$ | (16,291) | $ | (68,745) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
$ | (23,358) | $ | 23,991 |
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $45.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, and $42.9 million for the same period last year. Our operating assets and liabilities consist primarily of receivables from billed and unbilled services, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and accrued payroll and related benefits. The volume of services rendered and the related billings and timing of collections on those billings, as well as payments of our accounts payable and salaries, bonuses, and benefits to employees affect these account balances. The increase in cash provided by operations was primarily attributable to higher net income, lower bonus payments, and increased collections of receivables from clients during the first nine months of 2013 when compared with the first nine months of 2012, partially offset by an increase in unbilled services from clients and increased tax payments during the first nine months of 2013 when compared with the first nine months of 2012. The increase in unbilled services from clients was primarily driven by several large projects where the revenue recognized as of September 30, 2013 has outpaced the pre-established billing schedule. We expect to bill our remaining unbilled services on these projects in accordance with the billing schedule over the next two quarters.
Net cash used in investing activities was $16.3 million and $68.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The use of cash in the first nine months of 2013 primarily consisted of purchases of property and equipment of $14.4 million compared to $14.3 million for the same period last year. The use of cash in the first nine months of 2012 consisted of payments for businesses acquired in prior periods totaling $32.2 million. These payments for acquired businesses were primarily comprised of additional purchase consideration earned by the selling shareholders of businesses that we acquired based on the achievement of financial performance targets as specified in the related purchase agreements. During the first nine months of 2012, we also made payments of $21.6 million to the selling shareholders of newly acquired businesses. We estimate that the cash utilized for capital expenditures in 2013 will be approximately $20.0 million, primarily consisting of information technology related equipment and leasehold improvements to support continued growth of our document review and processing services, as well as information technology related equipment to support our corporate infrastructure.
Net cash used in financing activities was $23.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $24.0 million for the same period last year. The increase in net cash used in financing activities for the first nine months of 2013 was primarily due to higher repayments, net of borrowings, under our credit facility during the period. Our financing activities during the first nine months of 2013 included $5.4 million of deferred acquisition payments related to prior year acquisitions. The use of cash in the first nine months of 2013 also included $1.2 million for payments for debt issue costs compared to $2.5 million for the same period last year.
During 2011, the Company and certain of the Companys subsidiaries as guarantors entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with various financial institutions, as amended by the first and second amendments to the credit agreement dated as of August 31, 2012 and September 25, 2013, respectively (as amended and modified, the 2011 Credit Agreement). The 2011 Credit Agreement replaced the previous Credit Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2006, and all subsequent amendments thereto, by and among the Company and the lenders therein. The second amendment to the credit agreement, which we entered into during the third quarter of 2013, extended the term of the 2011 Credit Agreement from August 31, 2017 to September 25, 2018, and provided for less restrictive covenants, among other things.
The 2011 Credit Agreement consists of a senior secured credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $450.0 million comprised of a five-year revolving credit facility (Revolver) under which the Company may borrow from time to time up to $247.5 million and a $202.5 million five-year term loan facility (Term Loan) that was funded in a single advance on the closing date of the first amendment. The 2011 Credit Agreement provides for the option to increase the revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to $50 million subject to certain requirements as defined in the 2011 Credit Agreement. The proceeds of the senior secured credit facility were used to refinance existing indebtedness and will continue to be used for working capital, capital expenditures, and other corporate purposes.
37
The obligations under the 2011 Credit Agreement are secured pursuant to a Security Agreement with Bank of America as Collateral Agent. The Security Agreement grants Bank of America, N.A., for the ratable benefit of the lenders under the 2011 Credit Agreement, a first-priority lien, subject to permitted liens, on substantially all of the personal property assets of the Company and the subsidiary guarantors. The Revolver and Term Loan are also secured by a pledge of 100% of the voting stock or other equity interests in our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the voting stock or other equity interests in our foreign subsidiaries.
Fees and interest on borrowings vary based on our total debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) ratio as set forth in the 2011 Credit Agreement. Interest is based on a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or a spread over the base rate, as selected by the Company. The base rate is the greater of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, (b) the Prime Rate and (c) except during a Eurodollar Unavailability Period, the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.0%.
As of the date of the second amendment to the credit agreement, the Term Loan had a principal amount outstanding of $181.3 million. This principal balance is subject to scheduled quarterly amortization payments equal to 6.9% of the principal balance in 2013, 13.8% in 2014, 15.8% in 2015, 16.6% in 2016, 16.6% in 2017, and 30.3% in 2018, as set forth in the 2011 Credit Agreement. The maturity date for the Term Loan is September 25, 2018, at which time the outstanding principal balance and all accrued interest will be due and payable in full. All outstanding borrowings under the Revolver, as amended, will be due upon expiration of the 2011 Credit Agreement on September 25, 2018. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has made all scheduled quarterly amortization payments as they have come due in accordance with the Term Loan.
Under the 2011 Credit Agreement, dividends are restricted to an amount up to $50 million plus 50% of cumulative consolidated net income from the closing date of the 2011 Credit Agreement plus 50% of the net cash proceeds from equity issuances. In addition, certain acquisitions and similar transactions need to be approved by the lenders.
The 2011 Credit Agreement contains quarterly financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 2.25 to 1.00 and a maximum leverage ratio that varies throughout the term and was 3.00 to 1.00 as of September 30, 2013, as those ratios are defined therein, as well as a minimum net worth greater than $150 million. At September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with these financial covenants with a fixed charge coverage ratio of 4.14 to 1.00, a leverage ratio of 1.18 to 1.00, and net worth greater than $150 million. At December 31, 2012, we were also in compliance with these financial covenants.
The borrowing capacity under the 2011 Credit Agreement is reduced by any outstanding letters of credit and payments under the Term Loan. At September 30, 2013, outstanding letters of credit totaled $4.8 million and are primarily used as security deposits for our office facilities. As of September 30, 2013, the unused borrowing capacity under the 2011 Credit Agreement was $242.7 million. Borrowings outstanding under this credit facility at September 30, 2013 totaled $175.0 million, all of which was under the Term Loan. These borrowings carried a weighted average interest rate of 2.0%, including the effect of the interest rate swaps described in Note 9 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity. During the first nine months of 2013, the average daily outstanding balance under our credit facility was $191.0 million. Borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2012 were $192.5 million and carried a weighted average interest rate of 2.5%. Effective March 31, 2013, we have classified as current liabilities the scheduled quarterly principal payments due under the Term Loan within twelve months of the balance sheet date, as we intend to make these payments with cash from operations rather than from availability under the Revolver.
See Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for a discussion of certain risks and uncertainties related to the 2011 Credit Agreement.
Future Needs
Our primary financing need has been to fund our growth. Our growth strategy is to expand our service offerings, which may require investments in new hires, acquisitions of complementary businesses, possible expansion into other geographic areas, and related capital expenditures. We also have cash needs to service our credit facility and repay our Term Loan. We believe our internally generated liquidity, together with the borrowing capacity available under our revolving credit facility and access to external capital resources will be adequate to fund our long-term growth and capital needs arising from cash commitments and debt service obligations. Our ability to secure short-term and long-term financing in the future will depend on several factors, including our future profitability, the quality of our accounts receivable and unbilled services, our relative levels of debt and equity, and the overall condition of the credit markets.
38
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
For a summary of our commitments to make future payments under contractual obligations, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Contractual Obligations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There have been no significant changes in our contractual obligations since December 31, 2012 except as described below:
| During the first nine months of 2013, our long-term borrowings, including the current portion of long-term borrowings, decreased from $192.5 million as of December 31, 2012, to $175.0 million as of September 30, 2013. |
| During the first nine months of 2013, our deferred acquisition payments related to certain businesses we have acquired decreased from $10.5 million as of December 31, 2012, to $5.1 million as of September 30, 2013. |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This guidance requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, be presented in the financial statements as either a reduction to a deferred tax asset or separately as a liability depending on the existence, availability and/or use of an operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2014. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2013-11 to impact our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Parents Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment Upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets Within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity, which amends current accounting guidance on foreign currency matters. This guidance requires that the entire amount of a cumulative translation adjustment related to an entitys investment in a foreign entity should be released when there has been a: (i) sale of a subsidiary or group of net assets within a foreign entity and the sale represents the substantially complete liquidation of the investment in the foreign entity, (ii) loss of a controlling financial interest in an investment in a foreign entity, and (iii) step acquisition for a foreign entity. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2014. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2013-05 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which amends current accounting guidance on comprehensive income. The guidance requires an entity to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income if the amount is reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, a cross reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail about the reclassification amounts is required. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2013. The guidance required a change in disclosure only and did not have any effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 1, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of the assets of Blue Stone International, LLC (Blue Stone), a provider of professional services supporting Oracle enterprise performance management, information management, and business intelligence solutions. Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Blue Stone in exchange for $30 million in cash. The results of operations of Blue Stone will be included within the Huron Education and Life Sciences segment.
39
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates and changes in the market value of our investments.
Our exposure to changes in interest rates is limited to borrowings under our bank credit facility, which has variable interest rates tied to the LIBOR, Federal Funds Rate, Prime Rate, or Eurodollar Rate. At September 30, 2013, we had borrowings outstanding totaling $175.0 million that carried a weighted average interest rate of 2.0% including the effect of the interest rate swaps described below. A hypothetical 100 basis point change in this interest rate would have a $1.0 million effect on our pretax income including the effect of the interest rate swaps described below.
On December 8, 2011, we entered into a forward amortizing interest rate swap agreement effective on February 29, 2012 and ending on April 14, 2016. We entered into this derivative instrument to hedge against the interest rate risks of our variable-rate borrowings described above. The swap had an initial notional amount of $56.6 million and amortizes throughout the term. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we receive from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on one-month LIBOR and we pay to the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.9875%.
On May 30, 2012, we entered into an additional forward amortizing interest rate swap agreement effective on May 31, 2012 and ending on April 14, 2016. We entered into this derivative instrument to further hedge against the interest rate risks of our variable-rate borrowings described above. The swap had an initial notional amount of $37.0 million and amortizes throughout the term. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we receive from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on one-month LIBOR and we pay to the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.70%.
Including the impact of the above swap agreements, the effective interest rate on $76.3 million of our debt, which equals the notional amount of the swap agreements in effect at September 30, 2013, was 2.4%.
On April 4, 2013, we entered into a one-year forward amortizing interest rate swap agreement effective on March 31, 2014 and ending on August 31, 2017. We entered into this derivative instrument to further hedge against the interest rate risks of our variable-rate borrowings described above. The swap has an initial notional amount of $60.0 million and amortizes such that, collectively with our other two interest rate swaps, we are effectively fixing the interest rate on 80% of our Term Loan borrowings throughout the term of the swap agreement. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we will receive from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on one-month LIBOR and we will pay to the counterparty a fixed rate of 0.985%.
We have not entered into any other interest rate swaps, caps or collars or other hedging instruments as of September 30, 2013.
From time to time, we invest excess cash in marketable securities. These investments principally consist of overnight sweep accounts. Due to the short maturity of our investments, we have concluded that we do not have material market risk exposure.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of September 30, 2013. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act and such information is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
40
Qui Tam Action
On December 9, 2009, plaintiff, Associates Against Outlier Fraud, filed a first amended qui tam complaint against Huron Consulting Group Inc. and others under the federal and New York state False Claims Act (FCA) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The federal and state FCA authorize private individuals (known as relators) to sue on behalf of the government (known as qui tam actions) alleging that false or fraudulent claims were knowingly submitted to the government. Once a qui tam action is filed, the government may elect to intervene in the action. If the government declines to intervene, the relator may proceed with the action. Under the federal and state FCA, the government may recover treble damages and civil penalties (civil penalties of up to $11,000 per violation under the federal FCA and $12,000 per violation under the state FCA). On January 6, 2010, the United States declined to intervene in the lawsuit. After the Court granted Hurons motion to dismiss without prejudice, on September 29, 2010, the relator filed a second amended complaint alleging that Huron and others caused St. Vincent Catholic Medical Center to receive more than $30 million in inflated outlier payments under the Medicare and Medicaid programs in violation of the federal and state FCA and seeking to recover an unspecified amount of civil penalties. On March 8, 2013, the Court granted Hurons motion for summary judgment and dismissed the relators second amended complaint in its entirety with prejudice. As a result, we reversed the charge of $1.2 million relating to settlement discussions which we recorded in the second quarter of 2012, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. The relator filed an appeal on April 2, 2013. On April 8, 2013, Huron filed an appeal of an earlier denial of a motion to dismiss filed by Huron which argued that the relators action was barred because, under the FCA jurisdictional bar, the action was based on publicly disclosed information and the relator cannot qualify as an original source. We continue to believe that the claims are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in this matter.
Tamalluk Business Development LLC v. Huron Consulting Services LLC (Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance)
On August 22, 2013, we learned that Tamalluk Business Development LLC, who was Hurons agent in Abu Dhabi, and its principal, Mubarak Ahmad Bin Hamouda Al Dhaheri, filed a claim against Huron Consulting Services LLC in the Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance. The lawsuit alleges that under the agency agreement, Tamalluk was entitled to a commission on certain amounts that Huron collected from Abu Dhabi clients, and that Huron breached the agreement with Tamalluk and caused damages by declining to enter into a client engagement in Abu Dhabi and subsequently terminating the agency agreement with Tamalluk. Claimants allege they are entitled to $50 million for damage to reputation and defamation and another $50 million for breach of contract. Huron submitted its written response on September 25, 2013. The response states that Huron had the right to terminate the agency agreement with Tamalluk, and Huron had the sole discretion whether to accept or reject an engagement. Huron also filed a counterclaim on October 10, 2013 seeking a judicial order to permit the cancellation of Hurons commercial license to allow Huron to cease doing business in Abu Dhabi. We believe the claims made by Tamalluk Business Development and its principal are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in this matter.
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are not a party to or threatened with any other litigation or legal proceeding that, in the current opinion of management, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. However, due to the risks and uncertainties inherent in legal proceedings, actual results could differ from current expected results.
See Risk Factors in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete description of the material risks we face.
41
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan and our 2004 Omnibus Stock Plan, which was replaced by the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, permit the netting of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock awards to satisfy individual tax withholding requirements. During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we reacquired 3,738 shares of common stock with a weighted average fair market value of $47.93 as a result of such tax withholdings as presented in the table below. We do not have any publicly announced share repurchase plans or programs.
Period | Total Number of Shares Withheld to Satisfy Employee Tax Withholding Requirements |
Weighted Average Fair Market Value Per Share Withheld |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||
| ||||||||||||
July 2013 |
2,131 | $ | 46.24 | N/A | N/A | |||||||
August 2013 |
995 | $ | 50.94 | N/A | N/A | |||||||
September 2013 |
612 | $ | 48.92 | N/A | N/A | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Total |
3,738 | $ | 47.93 | N/A | N/A | |||||||
|
|
N/A Not applicable.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
None.
42
(a) The following exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Exhibit Number |
Exhibit Description | Filed here- with |
Furnished herewith |
Incorporated by Reference
| ||||||||||
Form | Period Ending |
Exhibit | Filing Date | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
10.1 | Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2013, by and among Huron Consulting Group Inc., as the Borrower, certain subsidiaries as Guarantors, the Lenders identified on the signature pages thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent for and on behalf of the Lenders. | 8-K | 10.1 | 09/26/13 | ||||||||||
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | ||||||||||||
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | ||||||||||||
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | ||||||||||||
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | ||||||||||||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | X | ||||||||||||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | X | ||||||||||||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | X |
43
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Huron Consulting Group Inc. |
||||||||
(Registrant) | ||||||||
Date: | November 7, 2013 |
/s/ C. Mark Hussey |
||||||
C. Mark Hussey | ||||||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
44
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, James H. Roth, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huron Consulting Group Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: | November 7, 2013 |
By: | /s/ James H. Roth |
|||||||
James H. Roth | ||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, C. Mark Hussey, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huron Consulting Group Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: | November 7, 2013 |
By: | /s/ C. Mark Hussey |
|||||||
C. Mark Hussey | ||||||||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huron Consulting Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James H. Roth, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. |
Date: | November 7, 2013 |
By: | /s/ James H. Roth |
|||||||
James H. Roth | ||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huron Consulting Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Mark Hussey, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. |
Date: | November 7, 2013 |
By: | /s/ C. Mark Hussey |
|||||||
C. Mark Hussey | ||||||||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.